You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #6: Actually, I did miss it - it was covered, then dropped. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

MH1

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun May-20-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message

6. Actually, I did miss it - it was covered, then dropped.

I'm surprised this isn't getting more attention. I like that the BG has raised it again, for those of us who missed it on the first pass.

BG article from May 10:
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2007/05/10/pentagon_restricting_testimony_in_congress/

Dailykos diary mentioning it:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/5/11/142116/187

And googling "Wilkie Congress testimony rules letter" brings up scads of mentions (but not the original letter, so far as I've looked through the results, which is what I was looking for).

Are we all just on outrage overload at this point?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.