You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: Wait a minute: Why is religion in that category? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Wait a minute: Why is religion in that category?
Comments about race, gender and sexual oritentation (all things you can't change, including the last one IMO) being off limits I totally understand and 100% agree with.

But why in the world would religion (a particular set of beliefs people choose to believe in, or not) be in this category?

For example, if someone is seriously considering Mike Huckabee I shouldn't be labed as "intolerant" if I bring up his (religiously based) beliefs on creationism, homosexuality (at one point he put it in the same category as pedophelia and necrophelia) and quarantining people with AIDS.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/12/17/huckabee-equated-homosexu_n_77178.html

The fact is, religion can (and often does) greatly inform someone's worldview, judgement and decision making (if they *choose* to let it) and IMO, that makes it subject to scrutiny just like any other belief.

PS---Where was the uproar when Mitt Romney said "It is as if they're intent on establishing a new religion in America - the religion of secularism. They're wrong."?

Answer: There WAS no uproar. The mainstream media largely thought the speech was BRILLIANT, or at the very least, ok. Even liberal commentator/columnist Eleanor Clift said (on The McLaughlin Group) there was nothing in the speech that would bother secularists. Keep in mind the conservative estimate is 20 million atheists/agnostics/secularists in the US, which is the single largest bloc of people after Catholics if I remember correctly.

Cenk Uygur made an excellent point when he wrote, --what if I were running for president and I said this-- "It is as if Romney is intent on establishing a new religion in America -- the religion of Mormonism. He is wrong."

Just imagine the ENORMOUS uproar that would result. Seriously, think about for a minute. Those two sentences would be EVERYWHERE, along with charges of hatefulness, intolerance, etc. The moral outrage would boil over. But when Romney says what he says? Crickets chirp. And so it goes on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC