You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #63: Not at all.. a spoiler is a spoiler. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #56
63. Not at all.. a spoiler is a spoiler.
There are plenty of people who have voted that they will refuse to vote for either Clinton or Obama if they are the nominee.

We don't know which group has more people. By staying in the race at this point, the weaker candidate may be chosen (whichever one that may be). That is a spoiler in the same way that Nader was a spoiler, in the same was Perot was a spoiler.


I supported Perot being in the race, Nader being in the race and Edwards being in the race, but in all cases, I believe it was EGO that kept them in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC