You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #56: Did not and do not support Illegal occupation. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Blue State Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #46
56. Did not and do not support Illegal occupation.
The manner and method of troop withdrawal has already been clearly spelled out and of course it would take months. But perhaps you haven't researched this and don't know any better.


This is called Phased Redeployment.

"Over the horizon reaction forces" need not necessarily be in Iraq, but in Kuwait or Turkey.

But perhaps you haven't researched this and don't know any better.


As a matter of fact I could say the same thing about you.

These guys are essentially jockeying for some kind of power, some kind of a carve up at the political table. It's very (INAUDIBLE). But then the military action is really just an extension of the politics.

They believe that by putting military pressure on, that gives them a stake that they didn't otherwise have in the military game. Unlike the al Qaeda extremists, unlike the Islamic militants, they are not fighting a global holy war. They are not fighting to create an Islamic state, like these Sunnis on one side and the extremist Shia on the other.

They want largely a secular society. They've said they're prepared to host U.S. bases, akin to Germany and Japan. Let's normalize relations. We share common enemies, Iran and al Qaeda. How did we end up on the wrong side of this?


Micheal Ware interviews Iraqi Sunni Insurgents
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/04/sitroom.02.html

Also read:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1179362,00.html

It seems that, at the time, there was credible support, from the Iraqi Insurgents for US military bases In Iraq, provided they were outside of populated areas. And this would have been possible thru the congress, and would have passed constitutional muster.

I must repeat, AT THE TIME.

As I have been trying to tell you from the beginning, time changes options and perspectives.

This is the nature of war, and it seems that you have no clue what impact the illegal occupation of Iraq has had on the geo-political map.

You might want to go back and do you homework, their will be a test tomorrow.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC