You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton campaign defends actions, says Obama should be ashamed if they find the picture divisive [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:00 PM
Original message
Clinton campaign defends actions, says Obama should be ashamed if they find the picture divisive
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 01:11 PM by maximusveritas
Here's the response from Maggie William, Clinton's campaign manager:
Enough.

If Barack Obama's campaign wants to suggest that a photo of him wearing traditional Somali clothing is divisive, they should be ashamed. Hillary Clinton has worn the traditional clothing of countries she has visited and had those photos published widely.

This is nothing more than an obvious and transparent attempt to distract from the serious issues confronting our country today and to attempt to create the very divisions they claim to decry.

We will not be distracted.



Note that there is no denial that the campaign was spreading this photograph. Instead there is a weak defense of the smear, arguing that there was nothing wrong about sending out the photo.

It reminds me of the people who call Obama "Barack Hussein Obama" and then act all innoncent when they get called on it. "It's just his name. Why are you Obama supporters ashamed of his name?" The photo is simply a continuation of the attempts to smear Obama with the Muslim label. First came the emails (which were also spread by campaign staffers), then the comments about him going to a madrassa, and now this.

The defense on this board appears to be that the photo is an old one, having appeared in the National Enquirer. Somehow that's supposed to absolve the Clinton campaign any blame for trying to spread this picture to a larger and more mainstream audience. At least this defense isn't offensive like the one from the Clinton campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC