You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #47: Then why not deny their involvement? [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Barack_America

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Feb-25-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #44

47. Then why not deny their involvement?

I will absolutely take their word over Drudge, so why haven't they vehemently denied any involvement in this?

Why haven't they denounced this photo being used against Obama in general? Why haven't they promised that they're going to track that supposed e-mail down and fire the responsible parties?

I'm waiting to give them the benefit of the doubt, but the more I wait, the more I wonder.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.