Reply #68: Yes. Now you answer one of mine: Which should BHO have voted against: [View All]

[patrice]

Money for Veterans Medical Care?

Money for Military Families?

Or Money for any one of several hundred other appropriations that were in the same bill with the "fund the war" money?

What part of the concept of things being COMBINED do you not get? He could not vote NO on funds for the war without ALSO voting NO for hundreds and hundreds of other vital services in the same bill? Are you really so stupid you can't understand that they don't get to pick and choose what they are going to fund? They're presented with these bills with all of the funding all together in them and then they vote on the bills; they don't get to say "I'll vote against this money but for that money."

If he voted against the war money, it would have also been a vote against all kinds of other things and you folks would be criticizing him for that instead. You don't care what the truth is. All you want is your pretty fairy tales about Queen Clinton the champion of Women when she SOLD you and YOURS into generations of economic slavery so she could have a chance to run for pResident. :puke:

BTW, every hear of a nice little piece of legislation called NAFTA? Whose baby do you think that was? But then maybe in addition to NOT CARING ABOUT KILLING INNOCENT PEOPLE, Hillbots also DON'T CARE ABOUT PEOPLE WHO LOSE THEIR JOBS TO FOREIGNERS. Tell me the truth now, you're a Republican aren't you.