You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #60: I haven't seen them. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. I haven't seen them.
What I have seen are people claiming 'sexism' where there is none. I'm sure there are people doing the same thing with claiming 'racism' where there may be none.

I've also seen people claiming 'racism' when there are viable examples. Clinton claiming she can win the Presidency where Obama cannot because she has the important 'white vote' is certainly borderline racism at least.

If Obama made the same basic claim that only he could beat McCain because he had the crucial black/white vote, then I would say the same of him.

As for examples, I can cite them;

Here's an unfounded claim of sexism;
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5892322#5898417

Yes, I'm called "sexist" for suggesting that both candidates' supporters are childish for declaring they will "never" vote for the other. How does that work?
:shrug:

Here's a thread where I ask where all the sexism is. I ask for an example of it;
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5600433#5600797
-Nothing.

Here's someone claiming that posting an unflattering picture is 'sexist';
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=5798822#5799259

Why? Because it's a picture of a tired, haggard woman. What if it's a picture of a tired, haggard looking man? Is that sexism too?

No. Of course not. Either way, it's a commentary on fatigue or age. And as you can see, I admonish the poster for being so rude.


That's not even scratching the surface. If I see sexism, racism, or uncalled for rudeness, I have no reservations about pointing it out.


But I'm constantly hearing claims of "sexism!" where there is none. I know the reason for it, which is why I post threads like these. It serves two purposes;

1) To call out the silly people who see 'sexism' that isn't there and hopefully bring them back to reality-based thinking.

-and-

2) To give people a chance to substantiate those claims and show me that it's really there so I know who the jerks are.


I'd say that's pretty fair of me. So far, No one's come up with anything. If someone shows me instances of blatant or intentional sexism, I will acknowledge it. I aspire towards being as empirical as possible, for that I need evidence, not presumptions of 'sexism'.

Fair enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC