You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #109: Fair enough. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #71
109. Fair enough.
Edited on Tue May-20-08 04:12 PM by Shakespeare
Clearly, I disagree with you on just about all of those points (especially RE the debates), but I'll respect your opinion and won't try to change your mind. I think we're each far too opinionated for that to happen. :7

All I will ask is that you read "The Audicity of Hope" if possible (it wasn't ghost-written, btw--that's his actual handiwork), and at least give him another chance. I was surprised by how strongly I've ended up liking him, and it just kills me to think other dems would view any eventual nominee as a "clothespin vote." I want EVERYONE to be excited about our nominee, and it wasn't easy for me to reach this point after Edwards broke my heart.

Clearly, something is clicking with voters--the numbers at that Portland rally this weekend just blew me away. And I don't think that's a fluke, and I don't think it'll peter out once the GE campaign gets going. I think there's something in his message, and a sincerity in him that people are seeing, that has excited voters in a way I've never seen in my lifetime. And I find that really moving. For now, I'm crossing my fingers and hoping it's real.

Regardless, though, I'm still glad you'll vote for him. :hi:

Edited to add one thing: The McClurkin thing bothers me, too. Having read his books, I would *like* to think that it's his native tendency to be inclusive that put him on that stage. I think it was a horrible mistake, but I think it was probably more a case of his hoping McClurkin will eventually have a change of heart, and not so much a case of political expediency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC