You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #30: What an historically clueless and astoundingly irrelevant comment. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

MADem

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat May-24-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #3

30. What an historically clueless and astoundingly irrelevant comment.

Did we only have thirteen primaries this year?

And two caucuses?

Did the party leadership assign the winners in the remaining states? Why NO, that is not what happened.

If you want to compare 68 to this election, we'll have to do it by the book, and add up those same primaries, eh?

I don't think you'd LIKE those numbers. Let's review those lucky thirteen, and see who won them this time around:

California/Clinton
Oregon/Obama
Nebraska/Obama
South Dakota--JUNE 3
Wisconsin/Obama
Illinois/Obama
Indiana/Clinton
Ohio/Clinton
Pennsylvania/Clinton
New Jersey/Clinton
Massachusetts/Clinton
New Hampshire/Clinton
Florida/Clinton

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.