You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #14: I did not and am not. It's just that it's not so outrageous as to warrant the responses. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

NYC_SKP

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Nov-04-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #3

14. I did not and am not. It's just that it's not so outrageous as to warrant the responses.

The nightstick was poor judgement, the militaristic uniforms, too.

The post is about the comments, you should read them or not, but this post is not in defense of their decision to be there.

Thanks much.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.