You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #89: It is not a red herring and you know it. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #81
89. It is not a red herring and you know it.
Just because you say it is doesn't make it so. Even in an impeachment proceeding the accused is given the presumption of innocence. In fact the legal threshold is even higher because in an impeachment the will of the people in an election is being overturned.

And please stop trying to cloud the issue. The original question was why didn't the House pursue impeachment. That it the question I was answering. Everything else it is as you would put it a "red herring".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC