You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #102: That's not what "taxation without representation" means. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Minnesota Donate to DU
Sorwen Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #100
102. That's not what "taxation without representation" means.
FYI

If you elect a representative who decides to tax you when you didn't want to be taxed, it's not taxation without representation. If you don't think that's dumb, I'm sorry. The reason why we elect representative is so that we don't have to vote on everything directly. We can't decide everything by referendum. There are lots of things of varying importance that we fund that would never be funded if we had to vote for them by referendum. The stadium isn't much different than some of the things voted on in the bonding bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Places » Minnesota Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC