Reply #32: Not true at all -- I'm one of the people involved [View All]

[Oak2004]

and I connected a devoutly Democratic DUer who spotted some voting anomalies that would be more easily detected in a small state, and who hence wanted a NH recount, with my rabidly lefty Burlington VT Progressive Party chair, in a chain that ultimately led to Nader.

The idea, and the people who sold it to Nader, is 100% GOP free, and 99 97/100% DU. No sekret plot to rool the world here. You can put the tinfoil away.

The anomalies correspond to a particular optical scanner. If we can show that that machine gave incorrect counts in New Hampshire, we have a powerful argument that there should be a manual recount anywhere that machine has been used.

Yeah, its looks a bit circuitous. But it makes sense to do the proving in the easiest place to prove it, first. Then we can nail them in Ohio and Florida.