You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(CA) State to join ballot probe - (LA) Software change not pre-approved [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 02:52 AM
Original message
(CA) State to join ballot probe - (LA) Software change not pre-approved
Advertisements [?]
Thanks to dzika for posting this on the Daily Election Fraud, Reform, & Updates Thread

State to join ballot probe
Software change not pre-approved

L.A. Daily News
Thursday, March 17, 2005

By Troy Anderson and Beth Barrett, Staff Writers

The California Secretary of State's Office announced Wednesday that it will investigate why City Clerk Frank Martinez changed the software on the voting system used in Los Angeles' mayoral primary without state approval -- one of several steps he took that slowed the count and raised questions about the integrity of the process.

-snip-

"Obviously, we have our vote tally software that has been certified," said Martinez, earns $185,018 a year in the post he was appointed to in September by Mayor James Hahn. "Our card reader and the InkaVote system was certified. This was a peripheral adjustment that we didn't think went to the core of the system."

-snip-

John Medcalf, president of VOTEC, the elections software and hardware company that sold the city its ballot-counting system in 1989 and has serviced it ever since, said the software change was because a mark in the upper left corner of the ballot that tells the counting machine what offices and questions to read was printed darker than normal. That caused the ballot reader to stop periodically.

"They didn't want the reader stopping frequently so they wanted me to make a small change. It was one line of code in the software that runs the card readers and tells them whether to continue and read the next card. I did that a month ahead of the election, giving them ample time to test it. They were looking to eliminate as many distractions as possible in managing such a big operation."

-snip/more-

http://www.dailynews.com/Stories/0,1413,200~20954~2766831,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC