You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: It would seem to me this language includes all voting machines... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
TheStates Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. It would seem to me this language includes all voting machines...
Therefore wouldn't it be true to state that Diebold violates HAVA?

Because, as the law in HAVA states the ballot of record must be verifiable and re-countable by the voter. I.E. A manual automatic audit must be processed in vote cases.

But Diebold's paper trail freezes and falters, making its function as a hand countable ballot useless. Therefore, the reasoning for using Diebold's tabulators becomes moot doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC