You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: TN: Cities want those who live out of town to vote [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. TN: Cities want those who live out of town to vote
Tenneseean

Tuesday, 04/25/06

Provision extends to property owners

By TRAVIS LOLLER
For The Tennessean

When Horace Hughes retired from his family's Franklin grocery after 51 years, he and his wife moved out of town and thought their days voting in city elections were over.
They were unaware of an obscure Franklin provision allowing people who live out of town, but who own property in town, to vote in city elections — a setup that's spreading to cities across the Midstate.

Shortly after they moved, an alderman they supported tied in his re-election bid in 2002. The board of mayor and aldermen broke the tie, voting him out.
"If my husband and I had gone to vote, things would be different today," Betty Hughes said. When the couple learned they could have voted, they vowed never to miss another Franklin election.
About 110 Tennessee cities allow out-of-town property owners to vote in local elections. Last week, the state House approved a bill that could add the small town of Palmer in Grundy County to that number.
Cities such as Franklin, Columbia, Gallatin, Portland, Westmoreland, Mount Pleasant and Mitchellville all have enacted property rights voting through special legislation.
But Spring Hill, the latest city interested in opening its ballot boxes to nonresidents, has a more ambitious task ahead. Because the city is not governed by a local charter, the state's general laws for how cities operate would have to be changed — letting 119 "general law" cities, including Spring Hill, make the voting change without special legislation.
State Rep. Glen Casada, R-College Grove, said he hopes to get such a provision passed this session, which could end in May.
Supporters of the move say it's only right for landowners to have a say in how a city is run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC