You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #22: Sorry Emlev, then we part in agreement, because unless you audit 100% of those [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform

mod mom

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed May-09-07 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #15

22. Sorry Emlev, then we part in agreement, because unless you audit 100% of those

op-scans then we leave the public with a false sense of security in the electoral system. NOTE I SAID FULL PUBLIC WITNESS (meaning that procedures could be recorded) IF you count 100% why have the machines (high cost) in the first place. I don't trust either party having control over the outcomes of elections and think HCPB...are the way to go. (AND MUCH LESS EXPENSIVE ) (AND DOESN'T FUNNEL BIG BUCKS INTO PARTISAN CORPORATIONS)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.