You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #19: Your "evidence" presupposes that the scanner counts in 2004 were accurate. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Your "evidence" presupposes that the scanner counts in 2004 were accurate.
Here is the evidence for 2008 NH Democratic primary election inaccuracy:

The pre-election polls, the initial, unadjusted exit polling data and the hand-counted municipalities all showed Obama winning by a significant margin while the machine counted municipalities had Clinton winning by a significant margin.

That evidence is hardly offset by a graph that presupposes the 2004 pro-Kerry, anti-Dean machine votes were accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC