Reply #52: No worries... [View All]

[geo]

Hi again,

That is understandable. Like I said before, I seen numerous threads on this topic, and they fall into certain patterns.

I am far from adimate about shutting this thread down. As a matter of fact my diligence keeps it high up on the list of most recently updated threads. I just want people to see how blatently some post writers attempt to spin this forum and get our valuable attention focused on sifting through a convulted mess of a claim.

There may be something in to the thought that corporations played a role in election tampering, but that doesn't give us any reason to toloerate posts that get us so far off the beaten path it hurts. I don't mind speculation, but endless links, etc. What I have seen in every thread that has evolved like this is major infighting and misunderstanding between legitimate forum writers, and a slew of instances where others dive head first into the murk and come back with questions, that only get answered with other pieces of non-sensical data.

At BBV, the moderator couldn't even handle where the post was going and locked it down, claiming that merely cleaning it up would take hours. The major concern were the number of unwarranted accusations made by the person who was arguing for this theory. This is just one of several instances, as I have mentioned.

See what I mean? :)

Warmly,

George