Reply #138: overeaction [View All]

[geo]

Hi,

Let's try this again. I was not "demonizing" you at all, nor am I trying to stifle free speech.

My lord. I am not the enemy, but if you prefer to believe that, fine. You stated, "You are obviously trying to get people to not look into CyberNET as well as attempting to paint those of us who do as crazy."

No. I am not. You are wrong.

Look into it, but be please keep claims accurate and intelligible. This is an old topic now, and I'm sick of seeing members get spun in circles on it. I would give anything to see a seriously well constructed case tying Cybernet or anyone else to vote fraud, even if some of the pieces were missing, but it has to be coherent or it just spins people in circles.

Also, I am not saying anyone here is crazy. I would be the last to dismiss the claim on that basis anyway. Sometimes even crazy people say very lucid things. It's just that posts this lacking in clarity, and this time consuming to get though have become suspect to me after seeing several of them over the last week. And lo and behold, I get attacked rigorously for pointing it out; go figure.

Once again my comments in the previous post are NOT aimed at you. It is aimed at the two others on this thread who seem to take delight in throwing rocks my way.

Warmly,

George