You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: Yep! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yep!
That is precisely my point -- then you would not need to rig any numbers whatsoever if you do it in strategic locations, e.g. democratic strongholds. Considering the fact that we are supposed to have an equal ability to cast our votes -- the fact that there were not enough machines allocated should deem this election invalid. That having been said, there should be a re-vote in said areas, and, given the speculation about the machines, a completely verifiable vote through paper ballots. At least, in my most humble opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC