You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #16: In normal standards of proof and evidence, something that requires extraordinary evidence [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
16. In normal standards of proof and evidence, something that requires extraordinary evidence
is something so against what we know/so unlikely to be correct, that even a lot of the errors we can't see are more likely.

Also, if you wanted to prove God exists (for example), so many people have such an emotional investment in the matter (ie. want to find a proof, want to believe the proof is true) that if someone were to come up with a proof, it would have to be subjected to intense scrutiny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC