You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: True, but... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. True, but...
I think the time and effort to save endangered species would need to come from a much different source than those smallish University teams who might succeed in reviving extinct species. It will take the collective efforts of hundreds of millions of people to have an effect on the current mass extinction.

It's easier for me to approve of "reviving" a species that disappeared quite recently and in the way the Tasmanian tiger did than it is to approve of, say, reviving a Neanderthal human. Some thorny dilemmas do come up with this subject. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC