You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: The Point? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Point?
The big M&O contractors change from time to time but it doesn't change anything. The labs are run the same was as the test site, but of course the sites do more than ever happens at the test site.

What I can't understand is why people are so up in arms about some conventional explosion. Its just fertilizer and fuel oil they are going to shoot, one hell of a lot of it, but nothing out of the ordinary. There are hundreds of tons of that shit shot off in West Virginia every day. Its the explosive of choice for strip jobs of course, but its always been a good standby for farmers as well.

Back to the test site. Here's how it works. All of those DOE sites, and the National Laboratories too, are operated by some contractor or another. It all began with the University of Chicago and the formation of Argone National Lab, but it spread. At the production facilities and the Labs there will be some Government presense, usually what is called a Field Office, and then there will be the Lab itself. The Government employess don't run anything, they just have oversight responsibility for the places. The way it works out is that the Contractors, who employ thousands of people in some cases, run the show and the Government employees sit back like sheep while they do so.

So the contractors who manage and operate the facilities (M&O Contractors) really run the show but the contracts come up for renewal every 5 years - generally. Its all fees of course but in the end when one contractor looses and another wins there is very little change in personnel - usually less than a dozen people out of sometimes thousands of employees - when the new team comes in. Usually the only noticable result is the employees get fucked over a little bit more with every new management team. It never gets better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC