You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Strange shite in the Alaska Senate race..... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 12:50 PM
Original message
Strange shite in the Alaska Senate race.....
Advertisements [?]
from AlterNet's PEEK:



In Alaska, Stevens-Begich Race is Far From Over

Posted by Lindsay Beyerstein, Majikthise at 8:38 AM on November 9, 2008.

Stevens currently holds a tiny lead, but there are quite a large number of ballots yet to be counted.



Nate Silver on the phantom ballots of Alaska:

Stevens currently holds a lead of 3,353 votes, or about 1.5 percent of the votes tallied so far. But, there are quite a large number of ballots yet to count. According to Roll Call, these include "at least 40,000 absentee ballots, 9,000 early voting ballots, and an undetermined number of questionable ballots". Indeed, it seems possible that the number of "questionable" ballots could be quite high. So far, about 220,000 votes have been processed in Alaska. This compares with 313,000 votes cast in 2004. After adding back in the roughly 50,000 absentee and early ballots that Roll Call accounts for, that would get us to 270,000 ballots, or about a 14 percent drop from 2004. It seems unlikely that turnout would drop by 14 percent in Alaska given the presence of both a high-profile senate race and Sarah Palin at the top of the ticket.

But even if Begich were to make up ground and win a narrow victory, this would seem to represent a catastrophic failure of polling, as three polls conducted following the guilty verdict in Stevens' corruption trial had Begich leading by margins of 7, 8 and 22 points, respectively.


I agree with Scott Horton, the more likely explanation is that someone has simply "lost track" of a good chunk of the Alaska vote.

Palin and her fans have a vested interest in Stevens winning the senate seat. If he is reelected and steps down, Palin will appoint his successor. She couldn't appoint herself, but she could step down and have her Lt. Governor appoint her.

As I said before the election, I felt very relieved to see McCain falter in the final days of the election. When he couldn't remember Larry Eagleburger's name on Meet The Press, I found myself thinking, "Whew. Nobody's going to cheat for that guy."

I think a lot of people would stick their necks out for Sarah Palin.

Correction: Actually, Palin wouldn't get to appoint Stevens' replacement. Alaska changed the law a couple years back. There would be a special election. The next question is whether Palin knows this.


http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/106296/in_alaska%2C_stevens-begich_race_is_far_from_over/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC