You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #62: a placeholder would be a waste [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #30
62. a placeholder would be a waste
A placeholder would be ignored on Capitol Hill. THey'd be totally ineffectual. No one would feel the slightest need to develop a relationship with them, deal with them, support anything that they wanted because the placeholder would be gone in two years never to be heard of again. And it would be a waste of money. You'd end up having to staff up an office for two years just to have them, for the most part, be replaced. You wouldn't end up getting very good people for such a deadend job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC