You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #4: It wasn't the number of voting machines in Garland County, Arkansas. It was the number of [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

sinkingfeeling

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Jun-10-10 10:23 AM
Response to Original message

4. It wasn't the number of voting machines in Garland County, Arkansas. It was the number of

Edited on Thu Jun-10-10 10:23 AM by sinkingfeeling

polling places. It was a decision made in March and it was a run off election which may or may not occur. Less than 20% of eligible Democratic voters went to the polls last Tuesday. Should states be required to have the same number of polling places for a run off as they have for the general election?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.