Microsoft Desperate says Target of Patent Suit OpenOffice.Org [View All]

[JPettus]

May 14, 2007 (Computerworld) -- OpenOffice.org today called Microsoft Corp.'s assertion that its open-source application suite violates 45 of its patents "a desperate act."

"It's just hard to put into credible terms," said Louis Suarez-Potts, a community manager at OpenOffice.org and a seven-year veteran of the all-volunteer group. "I don't understand what motivated Microsoft to risk so much with a position that can only serve to alienate customers, as well as those millions of people who use Linux."

In an interview with Fortune that was posted on the magazine's Web site yesterday, Brad Smith, Microsoft's general counsel, spelled out the company's position. During the interview, Smith claimed that OpenOffice.org, the open-source alternative to Microsoft's own Office suite, violates nearly four-dozen patents. Smith did not specify the patents Microsoft believes have been violated by the application collection, nor did a follow-up statement that a Microsoft spokesman issued today.

OpenOffice, which is available in editions for both Windows and Linux, can be downloaded and used for free. A version written for Apple Inc.'s Mac OS X Aqua interface should be ready for beta testing later this year. Microsoft Office 2007, meanwhile, comes in versions for Windows and Mac OS X and is priced starting at $149.

"This is an extraordinary and desperate act," said Suarez-Potts, who works at Collaborative Network Technologies Inc. in Canada. "I think it will backfire. Microsoft's using a shotgun against open source."

Suarez-Potts said he saw evidence of the scattershot approach in Microsoft's focus on GPLv3, Version 3 of the Free Software Foundation's General Public License. A Microsoft spokesman today said, "The latest draft of the GPLv3 attempts to tear down the bridge between proprietary and open-source technology that Microsoft has worked to build with the industry and customers."

But OpenOffice doesn't even use the GPL license, Suarez-Potts noted. "We use the LGPL," he said, referring to the GNU Lesser General Public License.

Previously, the only head-butting between Microsoft and OpenOffice.org has been over document formats, with the former pushing its Open XML and the latter promoting the open-source Open Document Format for Office Applications.

"Incredible and amazing -- those are the words I have for this," Suarez-Potts concluded.