Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush has mandate for Social Security plan, Cheney says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:14 PM
Original message
Bush has mandate for Social Security plan, Cheney says
Edited on Tue Mar-08-05 10:20 PM by Rose Siding
WASHINGTON - (KRT) - In an interview Tuesday, Vice President Dick Cheney said the Bush re-election victory provided a mandate "for the notion of personal retirement accounts" and that Democrats would pay a political price among younger voters if they blocked them.
...
But he rejected the idea that private accounts would be dead politically if they're not approved this year.

"I wouldn't say that. We want to do everything we can to move it as soon as we can. But we're going to be here for four years. And this president's very tenacious. I've seen him operate before. And he's not a man who takes no for an answer," said Cheney, who is about to assume a more public role in the debate as the White House tries to build popular support for its proposal to restructure the huge entitlement program and offer individual retirement accounts.
...
The vice president also suggested that Democrats, united now in opposition, are mishandling the issue. Cheney cited reports that some Democratic strategists, including former Clinton adviser James Carville, are warning that party members must do more than oppose private accounts - that they should more openly acknowledge the system's problems and offer their own alternative solutions.

http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/mld/myrtlebeachonline/news/politics/11084357.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not a man who takes no for an answer. Hmmm ....
Edited on Tue Mar-08-05 10:18 PM by Straight Shooter
That means he's rigid, stubborn, inflexible, and incapable of changing his mind based on the facts. As for the description "tenacious," why am I suddenly reminded of the time I got a fishhook stuck in my arm?

Notice the article used the term "private accounts" when not quoting Cheney.

edit: Cheney is lying. Those who designed the system in the 1930s definitely were forward-looking and anticipating longer lifespans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IthinkThereforeIAM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. You forgot...

... deluded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. sociopath!
cheney can go fuck himself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KDLarsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
47. Ah, but changing ones mind according to facts is "flip-flopping"
Edited on Wed Mar-09-05 04:17 AM by KDLarsen
... I never quite understood why the dems were unable to hammer home the message: "Kerry changes his mind according to the facts, Bush changes the facts according to his mind".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #47
81. What a great line!
It even works if you take the men's names out and substitute the parties!

Brilliant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shantipriya Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
62. NO for an answer
I am afraid Cheney is right.The tendency in this country to defer to Presidents(however dishonest and creepy they are) coupled with ignorant and uninterested public and die-hard Repugs, the President will get some form of privatization.
And it would be a sad day in the history of the USofA when that happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. WMD's, Jeff Guckert/Gannon, outsourcing is good, tell us another lie *
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Now THAT is HYSTERICAL!!!!

Gawd I needed that laugh! For once I can say, THANKS, CHENEY!

:D :D :D :D :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Look how he criticizes, using Carville's timely memo
Small world, Carville being married to Cheney's senior staffer and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. Small world, big co-inkydink.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. What a reptilian windbag!
Did he crawl out of his hole for this?

Really, this is what the Bush/Cheney ran their campaign on?

I thought it was vote for us or die.

It turned into vote for us and play chicken with the retirement and go broke!

Those Republicans, such jokesters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Some member of the crack US media ought to go back and see
what * said about SS before the election. Little or nothing. As a matter of fact, I can recall Kerry saying they had plans to dismantle SS as we know it and Republicans dismissed his "wild" comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. He promised privatization at a donor mtg, according to Suskind
then lied about it and attacked Suskind for reporting it...

Salon wrote it up, Oct 19, 04

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/19/nytimes_bush/

The latest volley came over the weekend when Republican campaign officials accused the Times Sunday magazine of fabricating a provocative quote from Bush in which he bragged -- behind closed doors and speaking to wealthy supporters -- that he would announce plans for "privatizing of Social Security" early next year, after his reelection. When Democrats jumped on the remark, dubbing it the "January surprise," Republican National Committee chairman Ed Gillespie dismissed the Times' work as "Kitty Kelley journalism," insisting Bush never uttered the phrase attributed to him. But the Times stands by the 8,300-word story by Ron Suskind, author of "The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House and the Education of Paul O'Neill," a revealing account of the former secretary of the treasury published earlier this year.

Here's a piece of the NYT article

snip>
"I'm going to be real positive, while I keep my foot on John Kerry's throat," George W. Bush said last month at a confidential luncheon a block away from the White House with a hundred or so of his most ardent, longtime supporters, the so-called R.N.C. Regents. This was a high-rolling crowd - at one time or another, they had all given large contributions to Bush or the Republican National Committee. Bush had known many of them for years, and a number of them had visited him at the ranch. It was a long way from Poplar Bluff.
...
"I'm going to come out strong after my swearing in," Bush said, "with fundamental tax reform, tort reform, privatizing of Social Security." The victories he expects in November, he said, will give us "two years, at least, until the next midterm. We have to move quickly, because after that I'll be quacking like a duck."

http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/101704A.shtml


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I remember that. Just when I think I couldn't despise them more, they
kick it up a notch. I'll wait to see our media research Cheney's call of a mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #21
36. best thing in the NYT all last year...... boy i shared that with dozens of
people who were on the fence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colorado Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #21
89. Somebody ought to dig up some film of * denying the NYT
article and PLAY IT ON FOX.

Sheese. When will people figure this OUT? The Republicans, the little people, need to get mad. Until then we are hamstrung, can't do anything by ourselves. We just don't have the horses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renaissanceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #19
31. Bingo.
Even if * HAD a mandate (which he DOES NOT), SS reform wouldn't count, because it's not a platform he ran on....and public opinion polls would have to support him, as well. They do not.

http://www.cafepress.com/liberalissues.14744291
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldeneye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. That title
cracks me up. What a joke.

The article was mostly Cheney blathering on, but they did give the dems some time.

"While Democrats acknowledge that the system faces a projected long-term financing shortfall, many of them dispute the magnitude and urgency of the problem. They also contend that the president's proposal to use some Social Security taxes to fund private retirement accounts does nothing to improve the system's finances, as Cheney argued Tuesday. Critics of the Bush plan contend it makes the financial problem worse, because of the upfront costs of funding existing benefits for older Americans while paying for individual accounts for younger Americans.

In response to Cheney's comments, House Democrat Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin said Tuesday that Social Security's projected shortfalls were smaller in scale over a 75-year period than either the president's tax cuts or his new prescription drug benefit.

"I don't consider that a train wreck. I consider that a long-range challenge that we are perfectly capable of tackling on a bipartisan, thoughtful basis," said Baldwin, calling Social Security "a challenge of manageable proportions and not a crisis."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:22 PM
Original message
I can just see Jon Stewart imitating
unca dick. unca dick really is a first class, top drawer, all around asshole prick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. If he HAD a mandate, they wouldn't have to keep SAYING he had a mandate
or is he trying to out bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
82. it's hard to think of a bush man-date without
being reminded of Jon Stewart's comment of his man-date in the Jeff Gannon context
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. He's a fucking psycho...
To quote Obi Wan Kenobi: "He's more machine now than man."

Cheney is a subhuman organism, there's no other explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks for the "advice" Dick
I've grown so weary of Republicans giving Democrats "advice". They can shove their advice up their private accounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think the Dems should follow Cheney's advice.
He only has their best interests at heart, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. Having reached March - the non winter coat owner Cheney can go to work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Wasn't that trip his last national coverage?
Maybe it really was an official embarrassment.

The only thing I've seen since then was some unofficial use of Air Force II back on the 11th of Feb (is that legal?)

snip>
The Vice President landed in Albany on board Air Force II late Friday afternoon. He's not officially involved with the Celebrity Quail Hunt, but he will be hunting at one of the hosting plantations. He wasn't at the dinner tonight at the civic center. But 230 other hunters were that's the largest group ever for this event.

http://www.walb.com/Global/story.asp?S=2937154&nav=5kZQWI76
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. You mean no FORMAL winter coat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushcrab Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. LOL--- I was just having a hankerin' for that shot. LOL
Cheney, what a baDOOF!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #15
39. Well he sure as hell cannot show up in the green one ever again!
***hole!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. GOP Pollsters least popular elements with the public
GOP Pollsters Say Personal Accounts Least Popular Element of Bush Plan

WASHINGTON (AP) - The heart of President Bush's plan for Social Security, allowing younger workers to create personal accounts in exchange for a lower guaranteed government benefit, is among the least popular elements with the public, Republican pollsters told House GOP leaders Tuesday.


The pollsters also stressed the political stakes involved in pursuing Bush's plan to overhaul the Depression-era program, according to a memo circulated at a session in the Capitol.
Older voters consider a candidate's views on Social Security to be "as important, or in some cases, more important than issues like the war, health care and education," they wrote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wwagsthedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. A mandate for what, exactly?
http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?itemid=18683

WASHINGTON -- American politics has been so corrupted by concepts such as "positioning" and "message discipline" that citizens don't get credit for their ability to decide issues on the merits. But when the public knows and cares a great deal about what's at stake, it is quite discerning about what's true and what's not.
That's why President Bush's troubles on Social Security cannot be explained by some alleged failure of the White House's usually impeccable communications operation. Conventional explanations fail because this is a battle over principle in which the facts matter.

So far, the president has made at least four mistakes. He assumed he could persuade the country that Social Security faces a crisis requiring urgent action. He thought he could accentuate the positive -- those "personal accounts" really do sound great -- without laying out what they would cost. He counted on getting good-government points by "facing up" to Social Security's long-term problems without proposing any hard steps to fix them. And he figured that some Democrats would fall his way simply because that's what has always happened before.

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
20. Didn't they deny they were going to do this before the "election"?
Kerry said it, they denied it as "scare tactics" and then, Lo and Behold, they did just what Kerry said they would. I hate these Neo-Con idiots, the media that won't report on them and the stupid bastards who voted for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Cheney is going on the trail to pitch SS reform!! watch out!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Relying on rich corporate fatcats to "fix" social security
Edited on Tue Mar-08-05 11:16 PM by Art_from_Ark
is like relying on Al Capone to help you file your income taxes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #20
45. Yeah. MSM has total 'amnesia' re: Shrub's statements prior to election
flatly denying he planned to privatize SS. Then IMMEDIATELY once he's elected, he flip-flop's loudly...and no one notices or says a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
25. Fuck Carville. This proves he's a horrible strategist. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ouabache Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. well, it proves Mary Matalin is co-ordinating his and Cheney's statements
pretty much. Since Carville is letting himself be played by his GOP wife, Cheney's assistant, then I think we can pretty much ignore him now. No dem candidate should now waste more money hiring Carville, he is being played by his woman and Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #25
69. No, Carville's actually right about this.
One of our biggest mistakes over the last five-plus years has been our utter failure to offer any kind of alternative to the Bush agenda.

We're absolutely right to say that Bush's plan is dangerous and wrong, but we need to shore it up by also saying "SS is not broken, but it needs a little tweaking over the long term, and here's what we propose."

How on earth is that a bad thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MeasureTwice Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #69
79. There's a repug line we need to stop repeating
The democrats never offered any alternative.

The problem is not that the Democrats never have any plans, it's that nobody heard of them because they aren't covered by the so-called-liberal-media.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #79
80. mmmmmmm....yes and no.
Yes, we absolutely get fucked by the media. But we really haven't come up with a lot of alternatives the last few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
27. We Have Openly Acknowledged That The Ceiling Should be Raised
and that the Regime needs to stop stealing from the trust fund.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burn the bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
29. Alert! Privatization failing...Bring in Snarling beast to scare public!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
30. He might be around for four years Dick, but you ain't no Duracell battery.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
32. WASHINGTON - (KRT) - Cheney says dog shit tastes like barbeque, film@10
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
33. Cheney just doesn't get it.. We don't want it.
Social Security is actually an insurance policy against poverty after retirement. SS was never meant to be used for risky investment accounts. We have IRA's and 401K for retirement purposes now. Why do they continue to force these private accounts down our throats when it is obvious that a majority of American's don't want these accounts and then claim that President Bush has a mandate on this issue simply because he was reelected. I don't recall the American public demanding he make changes to the Social Security program
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #33
67. Don't forget Widow and Orphans benefits....
These won't be covered by private accounts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
34. The plan has support in the low 30's, and even that is lukewarm
Cheney is a fucking madman.

Mandate. Oy gewalt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colorado Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
35. Here's what people are thinking about the "mandate":
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20050309/ap_on_go_pr_wh/social_security

When are they gonna figure it OUT already and give up on this dumb idea?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. these thieving bastards will NOT give up, Colorado
they are desperate to dismantle SS, it's been a wet dream of theirs for years. They did not go to all the trouble of stealing elections and installing a complete moron into the White House without getting THAT big payoff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shantipriya Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #37
66. Death of SS
I agree.I am afraid what might happen when they realise they are losing.There might be an unpleasant surprise for all us supporters of SS.
We are up against a very evil and dishonest bunch who has taken the country as a hostage.They will stop at nothing to achieve their goal of dismantling the New Deal.I am really worried for the future of this once great nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. The article is rated 2.94.
You have given the news article Personal Accounts Tank in Polls, GOP Says a rating of 5.

Its current average rating is 2.94 with 838 votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #35
52. Its current average rating is 2.94 with 923 vote(s). ...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colorado Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. I don't understand the low rating at all - you? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
38. Correct me if I'm wrong
1. there is no mandate

2. Bush hardly mentioned this during the campaign, did he? Or is my memory just going?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #38
41. He laughed when Kerry brought it up in the debates
and said, "We're not gonna mess with Social Security."

He stood there and told a bald faced lie because every other way they've marketed this plan has FAILED....from private accounts, to voluntary accounts to the new urgency that it is going broke and in danger NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. So how can there be a mandate to mess with something
when they said they wouldn't mess with it.

Some day, some how, these people have got to get theirs. I pray the karmic boomerang is headed their way soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
43. Then why isn't it now the law?
If Bush has such a mandate, and this is absolutely the right thing to do, and they have absolute control over every branch of government, then why haven't they gotten to work and passed Bush's plan?

Why is he on this tour now to promote it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. Is Cheney still saying that...
Saddam had a personal relationship with al Q.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
46. I guess this means Cheney is still alive
Every couple of months they have to wheel him out of his cave into the light so that he can snarl at the assembled reporters for a few moments before retreating back into the darkness. This month he's snarling about social secuity. Nothing to see here really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #46
55. ...and evidently living in some strange parallel universe
where people think destroying Social Security is a good idea. Oh well, good thing he's not talking about this planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hinachan Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
48. Here's a chilling quote
"And he's not a man who takes no for an answer," said Cheney.

Isn't that the definition of a date rapist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. It is, but
"Guck" Gannon goes willingly on the "man dates".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chomskysright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #48
63. 3 documented arrests for Bush:....
The first arrest of George W. Bush was for theft at a hotel.
The second arrest was for disorderly conduct at a football game.
The third arrest, we've now learned, is for a very serious crime -- drunk driving.


http://pearly-abraham.tripod.com/htmls/bush-arrests.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chomskysright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. 1st US President w/ a criminal record.....
George W. Bush is the first US president to have a criminal record and the first to be appointed by the US Supreme Court.

George W. Bush's Texas drivers license number is 000000005. Got it changed from something else in early 1995. WHY? Because in Texas, your criminal record is attached to your DL number!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #63
83. Don't forget about the woman who accused him of rape
and then was "suicided" - add to the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
50. That low life piece of
human excretment can kiss my happy democratic butt! Bush has/had NO freaking mandate (unless it was Jeffy-boy). This sob still promotes the "Iraq was behind 9/11 and there ARE wmd in Iraq" and the masses believe this stuff! GAWD, I hate these people.

Jenn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
51. Cheney is Satan
Note retreat on "this year". So it's dead for now.. but we have to keep the channel tuned to C-Span 24/7, or they'll attach it to something else and not notify the RW echo chamber..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
53. Man Date
GW Hoover's only Man Dates are Guckert & Victor Ashe.




"Prosperity is just around the corner." -- Herbert Hoover
"The economy has turned a corner." -- GW Bush

Herbert Hoover = GW Bush

Neither man cared about the Depression their economic policies created.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
56. More March Madness (and I don't mean basketball).

CAUTION: Mad dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
57. Um...the leader of a democracy should often take NO
for an answer. A 16th century monarch or a totalitarian dictator, on the other hand, never takes NO for an answer.

Bush is which one?? I keep forgetting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue4barb Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
58. This "mandate" trash is all the more reason to keep our own bulldogs
on the election fraud story. The more fraud we can uncover, the more America and the world should see there was no fair election, no mandate for anything this admin* is pushing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
59. What is he smoking??
Edited on Wed Mar-09-05 01:26 PM by alarimer
I would like to live in the la-la land that Dick Cheney apparently lives in. Polls show that people are opposed to private accounts. Mandate, my ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The White Tree Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
60. How can you have a mandate on something
that you denied you would do when you were running for election. I don't remember them talking about privitizing Socail Security. Seems to me it was the exact opposite.

We really need to work to brand the Republican Party with the words, "Do as I say, not as I do".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chomskysright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
61. Cheney's got nothing but bullying threats to use....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spikesmom Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
65. Give Chimpy a Banana
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
68. plans for Bush's ss plan not going well, bring out the big gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
70. Cheney's alive?
did he rise from his coffin just to give the dems political advice? Using James Carville's words? Weird...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
71. "Advise and Consent" just a memory now...
"Mandate" trumps all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woosh Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
72. The democrats are mishandling it eh?
We must be doing something right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
73. and if the people don't want them? fuck the people. we have a mandate
straight from gawd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
74. What!?!?!?!? He Didn't Run On This Subject
Even IF he had a mandate (and he doesn't), it wouldn't be on this topic. It would be on the war on terror, tax cuts, and no gay marriage. That's what his minions voted for, not social security restructuring.

So, even if he had some sort of mandate, it wouldn't be in this regard.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
75. Cheney:...is about to assume a more public role in the debate. Transl:
sending to the bullpen for the most brazen, wanton liar these bastards have to come in and get the job done (of destroying SS).


"...as the White House tries to build popular support for its proposal to restructure the huge entitlement program and offer individual retirement accounts."

Restructure?

"huge entitlement program"?

what is KRT anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #75
85. Welcome to DU, confludemocrat! I had to look up KRT myself!
It's "Knight/Ridder Tribune."

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
76. Yeah...just take back the tax breaks for the rich -- problem solved!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
77. This week I'm watching while my father dies of starvation in front of me..
Edited on Wed Mar-09-05 04:07 PM by calipendence
... due to various medical reasons where he can't get nearly any liquids or nourishment to heal and get better from an operation. It's a living hell I wouldn't want to wish on ANYONE! :cry:

But that's exactly what these bastards are asking the rest of us to do, if they take away safety nets like Social Security, bankruptcy, not increasing minimum wage, etc.

If we have older folks that are starving because they cannot afford to feed themselves, if we go through this f'd up "reform" will we:

a) say, well we cannot let them die, so we'll find some other funding (through our taxpayer's money anyway) and feed them, which defeats the purpose of their trying to "save" us spending more money on social security they are trying to "solve".

or

b) be heartless and say they are out of luck, and have them suffer the same fate I'm tortured seeing my Dad suffer each day right now as I speak.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shantipriya Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
78. Mandate
Does the idiotic creep know the meaning of "mandate"? 53% is NOT,I repeat, NOT a mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
84. It might be wishful thinking for Cheney to think
they'll be there for 4 more years. Not the way the shit pile of stink is piling up around them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
86. Since when is (stolen) 52% a fucking MANDATE anyway???
But fact is, these bastards are RELENTLESS. They have been for 20 years. They won't stop until (a) they're dead, or (b) they get what they're after. They're like Freddie Krueger!

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
87. Well, that's good enough for me!
If Dick Cheney says it, it must be true. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
88. He's out there to scare Republicans, not Democrats
"Asked if Republicans in Congress, many of them openly wary of the issue, need "bucking up," Cheney said, 'Oh, I think they're coming around.'

'The American people will reward public officials who address serious issues,'"

I believe this sentence is directed at the Republican congress. He knows he's not going to change the mind of Democrats, so what he's saying, is any Republican public official who doesn't support this plan will be punished severely. Their states won't get funding, their legislation won't be passed, they will be pariahs.

He thinks he's the f*ckn Godfather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC