Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On the way to freedom, Niger's slaves stuck in limbo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 03:11 AM
Original message
On the way to freedom, Niger's slaves stuck in limbo
More than 7,000 slaves owned by Arissal Ag Amdague, a Tuareg tribal chief, were due to be released at a desert ceremony last Saturday in the village of In Atès, 175 miles northwest of Niger's capital, Niamey.

A new law that came into effect last year was supposed to finally punish masters, who had long held slaves with little hassle from the government. Anti-Slavery International, the world's oldest human rights group, billed the event as unlike anything seen since the abolition of the transatlantic slave trade.

Instead, no one was freed.

Despite the government's positive move to announce the new law and its willingness to apply it, it sent out mixed messages later by saying slavery no longer exists in Niger. This contradicts eyewitness reports from international and local rights groups, and a signed statement from Chief Arissal promising to free his "enslaved people," a copy of which Anti-Slavery International has in its possession.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=2358&ncid=2358&e=1&u=/csm/20050310/ts_csm/oslavepix_1

According to Anti-Slavery International it seems Saddam didn't have any slaves but Republican Christians murdered thousands of men, women and children to FREE the people of Iraq and NOT Niger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. These are two different issues
Two different types of evil.

Anti-Slavery International counts people considered as slaves to owners, not subjects of a slave-state. Saddam held no slaves, even though Iraq was a brutal dictatorship.

As absurd as it may sound, there's a useful rationale behind counting slaves that way. ASI has provided strong legal and political support for local activists fighting against slavery and slaveholders. And they aren't ignorant of other forms of evil, either -- they are holding up their own end of the struggle for justice. I'm afraid it will take many specialized movements to start to push back the advance of tyranny.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You don't honestly believe the global corporatists are out to "free"
the Iraqis do you? It's no coincidence that Iraq is sitting on top of some of the worlds biggest oil reserves and that countries who aren't sitting on top of oil reserves but are living under dictatorships have gotten zero attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC