Links regarding the March 20, 2003 events
http://www.ccmep.org/usbombingwatch/2003.htm#3/19/03http://chicago.indymedia.org/newswire/display/51980/index.phphttp://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/iraq/chi-030320protests,1,5971020.storyhttp://savesenn.org/about_response.phpI'm still waiting to view a DVD of the March 2003 events that one of the Southsiders for Peace has promised to loan me but here is the preliminary findings of my investigation.
The March 20, 2003 rally was a response to the onset of the Iraq War on March 19, 2003. We all believed then that the war was all about oil and had nothing to do with Al Queda or WMDs and that has proven to be true. Certainly the latest reframe that the war is to bring democracy to Iraq is equally ridiculous coming from a administration that does everything it can to suppress the democratic process in this country. Given the active protests in Chicago that foreshadowed the March 20, 2003 rally, one would think that the Mayor Daley and the police would had a plan and channels of communication with the organizers of the rally to deal with a spirited impromptu march.
Instead the police, by their own admission and by the recollections of various Southsiders for Peace who attended the rally, were unprepared for a rally that size and so the police allowed the rally to go wherever it wanted, which was north on Lake Shore Drive. Everything was going fine (as a similar spontaneous march on LSD did in response to the Gulf War) until the march passed Navy Pier at which time a few hundred marchers moved to the south LSD lanes and blocked traffic. The Tribune reported police claimed that some actually climbed over some cars. Although these marchers apper to be indeed engaging in civil disobedience, the police arrested none of then. And that as far as I can make out is the entire civil diosobedience that took place during that march. According to marchers from the Southsiders for Peace when they reached Chicago on LSD they turnned west to Michigan because that is where police indicated they were to go. The marchers believed they were going to be turned south and headed back to Federal Plaza or simply dispersed in the area of Chicago and Michigan. But instead they were then herded by police into surrounded groups and arrested wholesale without any provacation.
The Tribune who cited only the statements of police regarding civil disobedience, reported that
Because the crowd became so unruly, police decided to make a firm stand at Michigan and Oak Streets, demanding that the protesters retreat back to Lake Shore Drive. The crowd did turn back at first, but then made another attempt at marching up Michigan Avenue at Chicago Avenue.
It was there that some exchanges between police and protesters became violent, with protesters shoving and police swinging batons. No serious injuries were reported late Thursday.
After the protesters sat down on Chicago Avenue just north of Michigan Avenue, buses rolled up, and police began walking, dragging and carrying protesters from the group and arresting them.
"There is a distinction between a war protest and civil disobedience," Chicago Police spokesman Pat Camden said. "Civil disobedience will not be tolerated." However the 800 arrestees have a diference story to tell in a suit against the city filed on January 21, 2005:
On March 20, 2003, Chicago police wrongfully detained and arrested more than 800 people in the course of a march to oppose the beginning of the U.S. war on Iraq. All criminal charges against the arrestees -- who were among more than 15,000 peaceful protesters who marched with police permission down Lake Shore Drive -- have been dropped, in what the arrestees’ attorneys argue is a clear acknowledgement by the City and the police that the plaintiffs did not engage in illegal behavior on the night of their arrest.
The police action differed starkly from a similar march a decade earlier, when roughly the same number of people marched on Lake Shore Drive and returned to the Loop, in a protest to oppose the beginning of the first Gulf War. Police made no mass arrests in that action.
Arrestees charge that they were never given orders to disperse and that in fact police refused to allow them to leave the vicinity of Michigan and Chicago Avenues. Those detained included tourists and workers at area businesses who were swept up in the police action. Several were seriously injured by police, including one youth whose nose was broken and another teenager whose arm was broken. Protesters subsequently sued the City of Chicago and the Chicago police department for a sweeping array of abuses, from wrongful arrest to misconduct, and are asking the court to allow the case to proceed as a class action. The City has opposed class action status because, plaintiffs argue, city officials refuse to take responsibility for the illegal detentions and arrests of people who rightfully opposed the war on Iraq, and refuse to admit that the actions of the police department on March 20, 2003 were wrong. The recollection of the witnesses from Southsiders for Peace who had several members arrested in the Chicago and Michigan area entirely supports the events related in the suit against the city.
So what exactly was the damage caused by the protesters as a result of police being bewilderingly unprepared for a spontaneous march in response to the onset of the totally unjustified Iraq War. Nil with the exception of a few alleged instances of cars being climbed on and the mayor's massive ego being trifled with. The disruption of traffic on southbound LSD was no worse than occurs whenever a significant accident occurs. However instead of arresting these individuals actually engaging in civil disobedience (That is it would be civil disobedience if the police had actually told them not to go in the south lanes and its not clear the police did) the police chose to arrest 800 individuals, the vast majority of who were peacefully following the police's instruction. Charges against all have been dropped.
As a result of this, Daley feels justified in not allowing peacefully planned marches to go down Michigan Ave and instead prefers to send out a massive police response to overwhelm peaceful demonstrations so as not to upset the sensibilities of the rich and powerful by allowing the unwashed masses to parade down their turf.
Next up: Is Mayor Daley's Renaissance 2010 plan really about creating further division among the rich and the poor by creating new schools for the well to do and military schools for the poor.
http://savesenn.org/about_response.php