Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Earth's Oldest known Object on Display

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
hue Donating Member (571 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 02:58 PM
Original message
Earth's Oldest known Object on Display


Earth's Oldest Known Object on Display

2 hours, 7 minutes ago
Science - AP

By RYAN J. FOLEY, Associated Press Writer

MADISON, Wis. - A tiny speck of zircon crystal that is barely visible to the eye is believed to be the oldest known piece of Earth at about 4.4 billion years old.



For the first time ever, the public will have a chance to see the particle Saturday at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where researchers in 2001 made the breakthrough discovery that the early Earth was much cooler than previously believed based on analysis of the crystal.

To create buzz about an otherwise arcane subject, the university is planning a daylong celebration of the ancient stone — capped with "The Rock Concert" by jazz musicians who composed music to try to answer the question: What does 4.4 billion years old sound like?

"This is it — the oldest thing ever. One day only," said Joe Skulan, director of the UW-Madison Geology Museum, where the object will be displayed — under police guard — from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. "The idea of having a big celebration of something that's so tiny — we're playing with the obvious absurdity of it."

more...

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=624&ncid=624&e=1&u=/ap/20050408/ap_on_sc/oldest_object
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Boy howdy! is God making a fool out of all those scientists or what?
making something that seems to be older than the week he made Adam & Eve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. How Do They Really Know


>>>>>>>What does 4.4 billion years old sound like<<<<


How do they really know it is 4.4 billion and not 4.5 or 4.356 billion years old.

Much like those who doubt the 6000 to 8000 year old bible timeline model I rather doubt the exacting authenticity of this claim.

Carbon 14 isnt all that accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. carbon 14
is a bit more accurate than word of mouth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Your reply kicks ass!
:yourock:

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. Excellent response nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. How can you do carbon dating on an inanimate object?
Edited on Fri Apr-08-05 06:30 PM by Toots
:shrug: I don't understand....by in inanimate I mean never had life as compared to having had life at some time in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. They almost certainly used some other radioisotope.
C14 dating only works back a few tens of thousands of years. But other radioisotopes have far, far longer half-lifes.

To answer the other question: when they say 4.4 billion, they certainly don't mean 4.40000000 billion, it could pretty easily be 4.356.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. They didn't use Carbon 14.
Carbon 14 is used for objects between a few hundred years old and 50 thousand years old. They probably used uranium 238 and/or uranium 235.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Carbon-14 is only good for tens of thousands of years
I don't know how one dates a zircon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Hmmmm... Dinner and a movie?
I don't know how one dates a zircon.

hi*i'm*a*zircon*and*i*would*like*copious*amounts*of*popcorn*and*high*fructose*corn*syrup*based*soft*drink...

Here are some handy expressions in Zirconese:

"Hi'ya, toots!" -- dfoi siodnkjw psovcmew!
"Say, I know what I like and I like what I see!" -- jfiuhe fhjincpw pdojcfj wpjiji wnjwpol pwoeofjp pw pvcj di!
"Oh, c'mon, Baby! Don't say 'maybe'" -- jfd kerio ewkoiwer mcoei anerfoicnwl!
"You did say you were over 18?" -- iutru jio eopifh epofih fjo 18?

Good luck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mutus_frutex Donating Member (469 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. C14 is much more accurate than what you are implying.
You can date wine vintages to a given harvest if you want. The problem is that it doesn't work for such long time-spans. For that other isotopes pairs are used.

You can take a look at this page for more information:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-age-of-earth.html

It has very good information and a primer on isochron dating.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnowGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. You all seem to be missing something important
about carbon dating. Really important.

It is only used for once-living material. Not old rocks.

The fundamental basis of carbon dating is that living material is taking in carbon isotopes in proportion to their abundance in the environment. When the organism dies, it stops taking in carbon, but the isotopes continue decaying at their normal rates, so their abundance will change at a very predictable rate, and that's how you can determine when the organism quit taking in new carbon.

'Goose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Hey, it is older: it was in a ring Adam gave Eve.
Told her the zircon was diamond. Yeah, men have always been like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. That was nothing but a cheap two-bit ring from a Cracker Jack box
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. I Thought They Buried Strom Thurmond
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. You beat me to it!
:D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I just spit coffee on my keyboard!!!!!!!!!!!
That's THE funniest cancellation notice I've ever seen in my life! Look for it on my blog this Sunday (link under the burning bush)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Don't mess with Texas --
Texas makes enough messes all on its own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. I just PM'd you the link where I found it-please give them the credit. n/t


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. 4.4 billion years old
Edited on Fri Apr-08-05 03:12 PM by dave29
when the Universe was a mere 8-9 billion years old.

For reference, the ten commandments showed up on the earth a supposed 5,000 or so years ago. How many 5000 year periods went by before God gave his laws to humanity on this planet? About 910,000 5000 year periods. In other words, God took his time laying down his law for earthlings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. He had all that time to word them just so
and still couldn't make Himself understood clearly by the bible thumpers.
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Whew. For a minute I thouht we were getting a glipse at how far back the
Rethugs were dragging this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleTouch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. There's a vial of cosmic dust in the Smithsonian...
...that's older by several billion years than the Earth itself. An amazing thing to see. I went there in winter of 2000 ... when we still had a real President living in the White House.... :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. I have a piece of Christmas fruitcake older than that
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
19. Many Biblical scholars agree that "40 years" equates to a really long time
so 4.4 billions years really means 110,000,000 40 years or a really really really long time just like the Bible says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Oh, I get it, theory of large numbers stuff!!!
Once you get past the number a fundie can count on their toes, it really doesn't matter because they aren't going to get it anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zerex71 Donating Member (692 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
23. The fundies will blow a stroke over this one, too.
Just like the mammoth bones they found yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. it's not very big -- you couldn't make an earring.
and it's not like it's a DIAMOND or anything.

call me shallow -- i like my stones either on a man or set in gold or platinum.

actually this is pretty cool.
4.4 billion years -- wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hue Donating Member (571 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
27. A little more info on the zircon crystal (link)
Hey, this is big news in Wisconsin!

http://announce.curtin.edu.au/release2001/c101.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
30. Oh, thought you meant my MIL
That's cool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
31. Joan Rivers looks a LOT bigger than a speck to me...
:shrug:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
despairing optimist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
32. A setting suggestion


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Thank You...
I promised myself not to go there, but it was killing me. I'm a sucker for the easy joke...:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
despairing optimist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. As Oscar Wilde said, I can resist anything except temptation.
Glad you liked it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
33. Are they sure that it is the oldest particle on Earth?
Did they test every atom on the planet, including the space debris that enters our atmosphere?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
35. Oh, man, this is the GEEKIEST thing I have ever heard of in my life.
Especially the detail about "The Rock Concert." I like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC