Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brazil's Lula says he will work for 'democracy in Cuba'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 04:11 AM
Original message
Brazil's Lula says he will work for 'democracy in Cuba'
Brazil's Lula says he will work for 'democracy in Cuba'
Monday, April 11, 2005
BRASILIA, Brazil (AFP): Brazil's leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has said he will work "for democracy in Cuba" and "against the (US economic) blockade" of the communist-run island, the newspaper Folha de Sao Paulo reported Saturday.

"We have a lot to do for democracy in Cuba. We must help in the struggle against the US economic blockade (sanctions). Brazil has a chance to help normalize Cuba's relations," Lula told the daily in Rome, where he attended the funeral of Pope John Paul II.

Lula, of the Workers' Party, made his remarks after meeting at Brazil's embassy in Rome with Cuban National Assembly speaker Ricardo Alarcon. The Brazilian president has a cordial relationship, but no great political kinship, with Cuban President Fidel Castro, whose lone major ally in the region is Venezuela's leftist-populist President Hugo Chavez.

Cuba is the only one-party communist state in the Americas.
(snip/)

http://www.caribbeannetnews.com/2005/04/11/democracy.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aneerkoinos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cuba
I don't think Cuba will ever abandon socialism. And one-party democracy is not necessarily worse than multi-party democracy.

What I would really like is no-party democracy, no-governement, no-president democrasy, no-ruler democracy. Like real democracy, dude!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That is what Cuba has
http://www.poptel.org.uk/cuba-solidarity/democracy.htm
This system in Cuba is based upon universal adult suffrage for all those aged 16 and over. Nobody is excluded from voting, except convicted criminals or those who have left the country. Voter turnouts have usually been in the region of 95% of those eligible .

There are direct elections to municipal, provincial and national assemblies, the latter represent Cuba's parliament.

Electoral candidates are not chosen by small committees of political parties. No political party, including the Communist Party, is permitted to nominate or campaign for any given candidates.




You can read a short version of the Cuban system here,
http://members.allstream.net/~dchris/CubaFAQDemocracy.html

Or a long and detailed version here,
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0968508405/qid=1053879619/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/102-8821757-1670550?v=glance&s=books


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. If you really want to know what makes the beltway boys twitchy about Cuba
it's this:

"No political party, including the Communist Party, is permitted to nominate or campaign for any given candidates."

Now that is election reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Open nominations, paper ballots - counted in public too. Fancy that.
Edited on Mon Apr-11-05 08:35 AM by Mika
:hi:

http://members.allstream.net/~dchris/CubaFAQ025.html
Cuba's integrated approach, however, gets as many people as possible involved in the electoral process from the very start--beginning with the public nomination meetings for municipal deputies, right up to the final vote for the National Assembly. This level of participation is something to be applauded.

By contrast, in the USA, where there is no such public nomination process, the role of the public in the electoral process is one of almost total passivity. The vast majority are actively involved only in the final vote. And even then, the majority often abstains from even this limited role!

With the safeguards built into it, the Cuban system seems to me to be a more democratic alternative. It is certainly no less democratic. If someone or some faction can't make it past this process, it can only be that they would not have sufficient public support in any case.


____


www.stopbolton.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good for President Lula. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC