Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Russia Does Not Dismiss the Use Nuclear Weapons in Preventive Strike

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Nottingham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 12:14 AM
Original message
Russia Does Not Dismiss the Use Nuclear Weapons in Preventive Strike
http://english.pravda.ru/main/18/88/350/11033_putin.html

Russia Does Not Dismiss the Use Nuclear Weapons in Preventive Strike
10/08/2003 13:27
Vladimir Putin's recent statement about the nuclear weapons alarms Western media

On the threshold of his 51st birthday, Vladimir Putin has apparently decided to remind the West of his existence. At any rate, foreign mass media outlets were rather alarmed discussing the latest statement from the Russian president. This time, Putin did not say anything obscene like "we will eliminate terrorists in outhouses," though.

Russian Defense Minister Sergey Ivanov has recently presented the report concerning the problems for the development of the Russian Armed Forces. After that, Vladimir Putin announced the national nuclear forces should be fundamentally modernized. The president said Russia did not exclude an opportunity to use nuclear weapons for a preventive strike against its "potential enemy." According to the analysis conducted by Western media outlets, the "potential enemy" implies NATO and the USA.

The Washington Times wrote Putin had decided to revise the nuclear doctrine to remind NATO of Russia's place in the world community. The German weekly Die Welt wrote that Russia was warning NATO against the fundamental change of its military doctrine. Moscow, the weekly wrote, is considering an opportunity to implement the new strategy if NATO preserves its aggressive orientation. Other Western media are writing articles in the same spirit. Analyzing the "attack" from the Russian president, the BBC added that Putin had decided so on account of unsuccessful negotiations with George W. Bush at the end of September.

Vladimir Putin has not decided anything - he has simply released a statement, it was just an utterance. Nadezhda Garifulina, former observer of the Sovetskaya Rossiya newspaper said: "He would like to believe, but- It seems that there are too many facts testifying to Putin's continuation of Boris Yeltsin's policy under a nicer cover."


more....

Russia wants to make it perfectly clear it has nukes too and it will use them :nuke:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. How is this different than Bush?
I believe they've talked about using 'mini nukes'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nottingham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Is there such a thing as a Mini Nuke
:nuke: The radiation our children will have to deal with will be unbelivable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yes, and I think we've been using them since Desert Storm...
...we call them bunker-busters now, and they use depleted uranium nose-cones to pierce rock and concrete to greater depths. I believe that we are also using mini-nukes to provide the extreme explosive punch to these weapons.

After Desert Storm some of the Iraqi troops complained about suffering symptoms identical to radiation poisoning...hair falling out, teeth falling out, gums bleeding, skin falling off, nausea, etc.

Similar reports have come out of Afghanistan when survivors coming out of the caves have died a week or two later suffering from the same symptoms.

Oh, by the way, my generation, those born in the '50s and '60s have also had to deal with radiation. Please see the following website:

Nuclear Weapons Test Map
< http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/bomb/maps/index.html#testmap>

Run your cursor over the a-bomb clouds to get the number of tests conducted at those sites. Ever hear of a-bomb tests conducted in Mississippi? How about Alaska?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bush and Pandora's box.
Once we had treaties, now we have threats of Cold War.

Bush said he might use nuclear weapons. Bush used pre-emptive strike. Bush made the world infinitely more dangerous for humanity.

Can't you just see him smirking? "See daddy, I did it all by myself! Daddy, daddy...??"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nottingham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yep!
Its so sick :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedeminredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. Perhaps he's
giving his "soul mate" a little dose of reality to show the administration that the US can't go around like a big ole bully and expect that no other country might adopt "The Bush Doctrine."

Hopefully, he's yanking Chimp's chain and maybe using this as a way to get the opposition to OPPOSE these crazy WH policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capt_Nemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. Precision (AKA "intelligent") weapons are expensive
Edited on Thu Oct-09-03 04:51 AM by Capt_Nemo
and although Russia has a big stockpile of them, since they are short
of cash, its like an arsenal of "silver bullets" to them, that would
require a lot of money to stock up again if necessary.

Furthermore they require an expensive infrastructure to optimize
their use, like recon planes and sats and, for some, nav sats.
For example Russia has had a lot of trouble keeping up its Glonass
network (GPS equivalent) since the USSR broke apart.

On the other hand they have a huge stockpile of tactical nukes
that don´t rely so much in such infrastructure, for obvious reasons. Many of them are installed
on cruise missiles whose platforms have global reach (subs, strategic
bombers).

Given these facts what weapons do you think Putin would choose if
he was to pull some stunt PNAC style?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. Preventive Strike, eh?
Now wherever could Pootie-Poot have picked up such an idea?

:evilgrin:
dbt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. see what testosterone does to the world??
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
10. Was their last meeting unsuccessful for Putin?
I think that Putin has let dim son know in no uncertain terms that any attack on Iran that results in Russian casualties will be met with a military response. (in reference to Israeli threats to bomb Bushehr). So the Israelis went for what they could get and made what was an essentially insignificant attack on Syria. Syria is all trouble and no gain. The attack was for American and Israeli domestic consumption. Any meaningful campaign against Syria will result in the neo cons and Sharon falling from power. There is nothing to gain and a lot to lose in fighting Syria. Even if you defeat Syria, you lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I think you may be on to something n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capt_Nemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yes teryang
that is exactly the way these bastards deal with each other.

Not very far from what one would expect from mobsters... in fact
that is the way things work when relations are based purely on
raw power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
13. Headline should read
Bush's shortsighted preemption policy officially screws the pooch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
14. Nice Going, Prezident AWOL!! Pre-emptive Nuclear WAR Because Of YOU!!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fozzledick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. What Putin really thinks of Bush*
I think he finds himself in pretty much the same situation that Chamberlin was in after his meeting with Hitler in Munich: he knows he's dealing with a madman whose lust for world domination won't be appeased by his latest conquest, but he's not ready for an immediate military confrontation, so he smiles and nods diplomaticly while quietly building up his military forces in anticipation of the inevitable.

When I heard about this a few months ago it struck me as an indication of Putins real judgement of bush as opposed to his diplomaticlly polite public statements:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/russia/article/0,2763,777379,00.html


China seems to have reached pretty much the same conclusion: It's always been their party line that a confrontation with the U.S. was inevitable sooner or later, but during the Clinton administration that was largely disregarded as old rhetoric while they sought to improve trade and diplomatic relations. Now they're concentrating on modernizing their military and gearing up for war.

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/asiapcf/east/03/24/willy.column/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Great links
Thanks. Especially appreciated the China article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. Hey Kids! wonder what Gramps means by "Duck and Cover"?
and "Cold War" and "Fallout shelter" and all the rest of those cool 50's things?

Well, thanks to President "Whoops, I shot my fat yap off again" Chimpy McCokespoon, YOU TOO can relive those thrilling, frightening years when granma and granpa used to go to bed wondering if they'd be vapourized and go to see Jeebus before morning...

sometimes I think they're destroying this country like a Cash Cow purely for personal gain, then something like this pops up to remind me that they (Bush, Arschloch, Rumsferatu, TinMan) actually think they are "Agents of Armegeddon"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbutsz Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. Something tells me
Bush giggles at statements this like a schoolboy instigating others into a fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC