Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Approves Detainee Treatment Rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:21 PM
Original message
Senate Approves Detainee Treatment Rules
Edited on Wed Oct-05-05 08:22 PM by cal04
The Republican-controlled Senate voted Wednesday to impose restrictions on the treatment of terrorism suspects, delivering a rare wartime rebuke to President Bush. Defying the White House, senators voted 90-9 to approve an amendment that would prohibit the use of "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment" against anyone in U.S. government custody, regardless of where they are held.

The amendment was added to a $440 billion military spending bill for the budget year that began Oct. 1.The proposal, sponsored by Sen. John McCain (news, bio, voting record), also requires all service members to follow procedures in the Army Field Manual when they detain and interrogate terrorism suspects.

Bush administration officials say the legislation would limit the president's authority and flexibility in war.But lawmakers from each party have said Congress must provide U.S. troops with clear standards for detaining, interrogating and prosecuting terrorism suspects in light of allegations of mistreatment at Guantanamo Bay and the abuse scandal at Abu Ghraibprison in Iraq.

"We demanded intelligence without ever clearly telling our troops what was permitted and what was forbidden. And when things went wrong, we blamed them and we punished them," said McCain, a prisoner of war in Vietnam.
Our troops are not served by ambiguity. They are crying out for clarity and Congress cannot shrink from this duty," said McCain, R-Ariz.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051006/ap_on_go_co/congress_detainees;_ylt=ApNL1RjFTUSN4KMKVZnBptqs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3b2NibDltBHNlYwM3MTY-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd actually love to see the Propagandist try and veto it.
Talk about further damaging the GOP's reputation (what little shreds there are of it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dalaigh lllama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. So who are the 9 idiotic senators against this?
Other than Sessions, who must live in the alternate reality of *world:

But Sen. Jeff Sessions (news, bio, voting record), R-Ala., said the legislation is unnecessary. "We do not have a system of systematic abuse of prisoners going on by our United States military," he said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is GREAT! Bush just got screwed by repubs who did something.....
Right :wow:

Now he has to VETO money to pay troops in combat, or back down from his ugly threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Powell weighed in on this, too
snip>
Former Secretary of State Colin Powell, a retired four-star Army general, endorsed McCain's effort.

"The world will note that America is making a clear statement with respect to the expected future behavior of our soldiers. Such a reaction will help deal with the terrible public diplomacy crisis created by Abu Ghraib," Powell said in a letter that McCain read on the Senate floor.


Then there's Sessions, blindfolded, over in the corner:

But Sen. Jeff Sessions (news, bio, voting record), R-Ala., said the legislation is unnecessary. "We do not have a system of systematic abuse of prisoners going on by our United States military," he said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is wonderful news. Though, I thought this was ironed out at the
Geneva Conventions 5 decades ago, it's a welcome change to see politicians waking up.

Bush administration officials say the legislation would limit the president’s authority and flexibility in war.

So, they advocate torture as a tool in "flexibility," yet claim they were not privy to it? That's interesting ain't it? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
recovering democrat Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanking the Repugs
I let both my Republican Senators know how much I appreciate their votes on this amendment. It is pretty amazing to see Republicans in Congress doing something for our troops instead of just rubber-stamping Bush. They are going to catch hell for it though, so it is a good idea to let them know some of us REALLY appreciate them (this one time!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bush will veto this!
I am surprised at how many Republicans voted for this.

DeLay is no longer controlling the House, so perhaps they will get brave there too and try to protect our troops by putting them under the POW rules spelled out in the Manual.

Rumsfeld and Bush are guilty of war crimes for authorizing torture!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Let's hope so. More people will see what a loon he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. here are the nine no-votes
Allard (R-CO)
Bond (R-MO)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sessions (R-AL)
Stevens (R-AK)

Pretty much a murderer's row of nutjobs. Not a single one is up for re-election in 2006, by the way.

onenote


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Thank you so much for posting these goddamned names.
I want to memorize them.

Very angry to learn one of them, Pat Roberts, is from my state.

I hope they eventually become unable to drink enough to drown their consciences. Kit Bond from Missouri has been doing his best for years to get rid of his conscience, and I think he's almost made it.

Allard (R-CO)
Bond (R-MO)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sessions (R-AL)
Stevens (R-AK)

I'm posting their photos in the order they are listed:

http://inside.c-spanarchives.org:8080/cspan/Pictures/Persons/004055/004055-183605.jpg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. MSNBC Headline: Bush rebuffed 90-9! Wow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Need this on the greatest as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kostya Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. FWIW: here's my more cynical view of this (really have to stop channeling
my departed dad :) ):

McCain saw the writing on the wall of what could happen if a bill like this didn't get overwhelming support. He's seen the much more terrible evidence of war crimes that went on at Gitmo and Abu Ghraib. This bill short-circuits any further investigation and exposure. It will be watered down in the Senate-House negotiations and all this stuff will be swept under the rug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. Having watched McCain, I can only think this was on the table only
so the repubs have a response when the photos and videos that are to be released due to a court order are made public. It is a good amendment, the sad thing is; the only reason it was on the floor at all was because of the damaging material that is about to be released. McCain does NOTHING without looking at the POLITICAL ramifications as opposed to simply doing what is right.

This will be used as a 'yeah but' excuse, imo. I am glad it passed but it should never have been needed in the first place not to mention that, if the subsequent release of photos and videos is accepted as 'yesterday's news', the abuse and torture will continue unabated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeahD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yes, I was thinking the same.
Senators have seen the evidence, and they need to distance themselves. Would have been more meaningful, if they had acted shortly after the first photos were released. But then, the sentiment among Americans was different than it is today. The war drums were still beating loudly, and I even heard more than one Repub. friend say, "This is war."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Pentagon Appealing the FOIA request
The Pentagon has about 10 days left on their appeal, but to what court are they appealling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. It's way overdue but once in a while...
Repubs do the correct thing. Now... on the impeaching Bush/Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:36 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Did you read the most recent judges' decision?
It was quite definitively ruling in favor of the ACLU's request.
that was about 6 days ago, and the Pentagon had 15 days to file their next expected appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
19. Scott McClellan said Bush would veto it
The entire military spending bill, because of the torture language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. How can Bush and company look people in the eye?
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 04:45 AM by Judi Lynn
They think they're so powerful it really doesn't matter any more if people see them as pure evil.

We've had other Presidents all our lives, we've never known anything else, and those men, Democrats usually, were never all that impressed with the power that was available to them.

Bush needs to act as if he's been somewhere, for Christ's sakes. There's no reason for the entire world to suffer just because he's an undisciplined @$$####.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. My guess is
They console themselves with humorous aerial bombing campaigns, or
by mirthfully mocking condemned death row inmates.
:shrug:

You are spot on, they don't care because they aren't running for office, and Bush is a deluded crack addled conneticut cowboy.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC