Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: Private Firms Assist U.S. Military

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 04:53 PM
Original message
AP: Private Firms Assist U.S. Military
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031029/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_private_army&cid=540&ncid=1473

In Iraq (news - web sites), private contractors do just about everything a soldier would do. They sling Spam in mess tents. They tote guns along base perimeters. They shoot. They get shot. Sometimes they get killed. And it's not just in Iraq, but around the world — in conflict zones from Liberia (news - web sites) to Kosovo to Afghanistan (news - web sites) — that the United States is putting hired help behind the front lines to ease the burden of its overworked armed forces.

By paying civilians to handle military tasks, the Bush administration is freeing up U.S. troops to fight. But the use of contractors also hides the true costs of war.

Their dead aren't added to official body counts. Their duties — and profits — are hidden by close-mouthed executives who won't give details to Congress. And as their coffers and roles swell, companies are funneling earnings into political campaigns and gaining influence over military policy — even getting paid to recommend themselves for lucrative contracts.

For the civilians handling these soldierly jobs, the risks are high. snip

Contractors' deaths aren't counted among the tally of more than 350 U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq. No one is sure how many private workers have been killed, or, indeed, even how many are toiling in Iraq for the U.S. government. Estimates range from under 10,000 to more than 20,000 — which could make private contractors the largest U.S. coalition partner ahead of Britain's 11,000 troops.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. remember the unnamed wounded from the Hotel attack?
There were 4 that were wounded that no one seemed to be able to identify. They were vaguely refered to as CPA "associates" or something like that. Hmmmmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Any friggin thing to avoid accountability
God I hate this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mojowork_n Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Contractor" is much too large an umbrella term...
"Contractor" describes everything from the ex-spooks and local para-military auxiliaries, fighting in the jungles, in places like Columbia and Central America... to the quasi-autonomous "military advisors" that helped the Croatian Army re-train their officer corps, and supplied them with aerial intelligence, for assorted ethnic cleansing operations, in the mid-90's... It also covers outfits that have included total bottom-of-the-barrel losers... as in the "contract" military personal/pedophiles reported in this story:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/military/story/0,11816,850107,00.html

http://www.iabolish.com/news/press-coverage/2003/sos02-09-03.htm

Basically, I think they're people doing jobs that the government doesn't want to be officially on the hook for, in one way or the other.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. MERCENARIES
Why the fuck aren't they just calling them what they are? The US is hiring mercenaries to carry out the dirty work...Yeesh, what's the problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is the big story of this war, IMO.
War, for profit. It's unbelievable really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davhill Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. In the 21st Century the State has become nothing
but a money conduit for corporations. Policy is decided by corporations and implemented by corporations to achieve the goals of corporations. The era of government is dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. What's REALLY scary is how
little time has been needed to make the switch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. The essential act of war is destruction...

... not necessarily of human lives, but of the products of human labour. War is a way of shattering to pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, and hence, in the long run, too intelligent. Even when weapons of war are not actually destroyed, their manufacture is still a convenient way of expending labour power without producing anything that can be consumed.
...
And at the same time the consciousness of being at war, and therefore in danger, makes the handing-over of all power to a small caste seem the natural, unavoidable condition of survival. War, it will be seen, not only accomplishes the necessary destruction, but accomplishes it in a psychologically acceptable way. In principle it would be quite simple to waste the surplus labour of the world by building temples and pyramids, by digging holes and filling them up again, or even by producing vast quantities of goods and then setting fire to them. But this would provide only the economic and not the emotional basis for a hierarchical society.
...
-- Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism, Emmanuel Goldstein via George Orwell, 1984
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. And I thought the military was proud to call themselves Republicans.
Who's going to tell them they're being co-opted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
10. Remember they can be hired by anyone!!!!
The scarey thing is that you may come find out that
your the next target!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snazzy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. I bet they have a non-disclosure death benefit
Edited on Thu Oct-30-03 01:56 AM by Snazzy
AP provides such fine pointers for further investigative journalism--they are hinting at a much bigger story here, like they often are. And that's their best--and correct--journalistic function, I think, as The Wire Service People. Get some facts, get 'em out the door quick. Done deal.

The problem is that so rarely does anyone in US media pick up on anything anymore, in any meaningful way. With the exception of a couple of folks well known around DU, the investigation is dead. All stories must be served on a platter. Change some words, add one or two new facts, or, better yet, distort the AP provided ones, and voila! another day of covering your sorry make-believe-free-press ass. Mission accomplished, Bud Lite time. (ugh)

With that rant so happily set-free: I would wager that the # of dead mercs and Halliburton misc. stooges must be high. Just not being reported--unknown to media. At least the DOD has an obligation to tell us about dead GI's. Companies don't.

I add this: I recently saw a termination agreement from Bremmer's former (?) company, an HR firm. About 30 pages of nearly impenetrable lawyer-speak. Highlight was a payout fund for agreeing to not bring suit. Bet it's about the same for dead dudes in Iraq. Family wants the payout, keep mouth shut.

Don't know, but, like I said, I'd bet that's the deal. Rest assured we will find out in 20 years or so. So we got that working for us.

--Snazzy

Gunga ga gunga ga ga gunga galunga.

(edit typo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC