|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 04:26 PM Original message |
Texas Supreme Court upholds ruling that children should be returned to parents at polygamist ranch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthisfreedom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
1. Not like we didn't see this coming. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faygo Kid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. The pics of Warren Jeffs kissing 12 year olds did it for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 04:55 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. The courts decided you actually have to have probable cause |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:20 PM Response to Reply #11 |
21. And how do you obtain evidence and protect children when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:30 PM Original message |
The already have probable cause against a small number of people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
56. The Jeffs case doesn't prove what you think it does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
High Plains (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:42 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. The Texas Supreme Court thinks there are ways: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:37 PM Response to Reply #28 |
58. How do you order the removal of an alleged perpetrator when very few |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:40 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. I guess you can tell all the men to get off the property. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:56 PM Response to Reply #61 |
65. I wonder whether that would be considered within the bounds of the law. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 10:06 PM Response to Reply #65 |
82. CPS can also supervise the children *on* the compound |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 07:01 PM Response to Reply #61 |
66. Wouldn't you have to prove they were a danger first? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musette_sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 07:15 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. well, we all know that going after the men |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #68 |
74. And what does removing children from the women do to the women? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musette_sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 08:27 PM Response to Reply #74 |
77. you were talking about removing perpetrators. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 08:56 PM Response to Reply #68 |
79. yup. good luck and hope you have patience here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musette_sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 09:15 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. it's frustrating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sen. Walter Sobchak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
3. the title should be: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. The state messed up how they presented this to the courts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raystorm7 (944 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Texas Supreme Court: Back to the Pedo Rape farm they must go! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PSPS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
5. Aren't those DNA tests due back soon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreeState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 04:50 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. DNA test dont change the law - you cant take children without proof they are or will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. They could have just taken children from families with pregnant girls and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:48 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. Well, I guess Supreme Court just didn't buy that argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 08:25 PM Response to Reply #30 |
76. "it's unclear which child belongs to which parent" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:16 PM Response to Reply #23 |
45. CNN clip:dissenting judges said pubescent girls should've been removed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
7. "You May Molest Children as You Will" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
9. Possibly Stupid Question Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. I'm not an expert on the case, but I didn't think they did. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Damn /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
24. I read that they had 8 underage girls ready to testify for CPS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musette_sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
10. since Texas only recently (<25 years ago) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Dawn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
12. I guess they decided that because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
medeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
13. Salt Lake tv news channels are orgasmic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:21 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. See, this is why I think I would freak out living in a place like Salt Lake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
48. Yup. some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
medeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 07:59 PM Response to Reply #48 |
72. story above dubya's visit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
15. I was afraid of this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JonQ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
16. Morally the wrong decision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atreides1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:03 PM Response to Reply #16 |
38. It was the Lawful Decision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
17. Sorta reminds me of the ending of "Chinatown" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pleah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
18. Good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. I agree. And with JonQ's comment above. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
64. I agree as well. You can't take peoples children away w'out serious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
High Plains (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
25. From the opinion: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
26. ACLU to Texas: Don't mess with the Constitution, assholes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:40 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. "When the Constitution wins, we all win." Ya got that right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:54 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. What gets me is the either/or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:11 PM Original message |
CPS also held some adult women as "disputed minors." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:13 PM Response to Reply #33 |
42. Yes, but this is a broader problem. It's "My justice" vs "The Greater Justice". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:19 PM Response to Reply #33 |
46. How do you confirm ages and identity without investigating? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:35 PM Response to Reply #46 |
55. Do you think CPS should be able to grab you from the street if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:36 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. How do you confirm ages and identity without investigating? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:37 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. Well, let me make it real simple. How about looking at birth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. And if there were no birth certificates, how do you confirm ages and identity without investigating? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 07:20 PM Response to Reply #57 |
69. Hi uppity! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:47 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Well... there it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:53 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Just wait until the lawsuits start coming in. And they're likely going to win 'em, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:56 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. real dumb |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:53 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. The law is the law. There were little children taken from their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:54 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Just a Question: What if it were a 12 Year Old Girl? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:57 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Let me just put it this way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 05:59 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. You Didn't Answer My Question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:08 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. I just did. I can not tell you what should be done in case of an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:12 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. By household....see there's a problem...most everybody was housed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:32 PM Response to Reply #41 |
52. Not true. They didn't all live in the same house. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 09:25 PM Response to Reply #52 |
81. I said "Most everybody", which doesn't mean all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:44 PM Response to Reply #39 |
63. "abstract"....? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musette_sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 07:12 PM Response to Reply #63 |
67. people who think women and children are chattel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 08:11 PM Response to Reply #67 |
73. It's the mothers who filed for an appeal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musette_sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 08:22 PM Response to Reply #73 |
75. the women who are owned by the men. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:11 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. And I'll bet you she won't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musette_sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:32 PM Response to Reply #40 |
51. that would be "she" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musette_sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:33 PM Response to Reply #32 |
53. i'm sure all of the children |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-30-08 12:54 PM Response to Reply #53 |
83. Actually.... those children won't be going anywhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musette_sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-30-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. i realize that. actually the whole case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-30-08 01:19 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. Agreed - this is far from over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-30-08 01:22 PM Response to Reply #85 |
87. Yup. It will be interesting to see what DNA test say, but aren't they just for kids/moms? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musette_sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-30-08 01:59 PM Response to Reply #87 |
89. Uncle Warren just got swabbed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-30-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. Uncle Warren Jeffs? Found some info in article from april... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musette_sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-30-08 02:45 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. swabs were taken yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-30-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. Thanks. This is an interesting line from the story... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:40 PM Response to Reply #92 |
94. Found an article on why. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:13 PM Response to Reply #26 |
43. and once again, women and children lose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
44. Bit from CNN-Dissenting, unlikely kids will be returned soon(DNA),"broad authority" to protect kids |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 07:24 PM Response to Reply #44 |
70. Maybe, but that doesn't mean they have to stay in the state's custody |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-30-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #70 |
86. But CPS cannot release the kids to anyone other than the kids' parents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
47. The ruling only concerns 124 children of the 38 mothers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
49. Texas "supreme" court just cast their vote in favor in child sex abuse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:29 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. The law attempts to be objective. To those swept up in the subjective emotion related to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:33 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. When the law protects cults that abuse their children, its' time to work on the law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 06:37 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. I applaud anyone willing to work to change the law to their liking, even if it is not to mine. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 07:27 PM Response to Reply #54 |
71. I heard this rumor about Wiccas, Should I make an anonymous call? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SunDrop23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-29-08 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
78. Home of George W. Bush. Enough said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-30-08 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
88. Nothing coming out of Texas suprises me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-30-08 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
91. Here is Dissenting Opinion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 01:21 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC