From last week's Sacramento News & Review:
The medieval empire
Is resistance futile as America goes feudal?
By Kel Munger
"Hateful poverty, of all evils worst!" It's an exclamation we might argue with in this time of seemingly endless consumption, but Geoffrey Chaucer makes a good case for placing extreme neediness at the top of the list of horrors to be endured. In the medieval poet’s best-known work, The Canterbury Tales, the character of the Man at Law spends his prologue expounding on the difficulties of a life without financial security: “It’s better to be dead than poor.”
Of course, Chaucer’s poetry is old. Really, really old. Poverty such as the Man at Law describes isn’t something with which we contemporary folk need be too concerned. To many of us, all the horrors of the medieval period--poverty and debt, poor health and no medicine, famine, being sent off to fight in wars for the profit of the nobility--seem so far away from our super-sized economy as to be of merely historical interest. But perhaps we shouldn’t be so hasty.
A series of moves are afoot to turn the socioeconomic clock back for most wage earners--and we’re not talking just a few decades. William Greider, writing in The Nation a couple of years ago, argued that a neoconservative, Bush-administration-approved plan would take the United States back to the McKinley era--a time of robber barons, cheap labor and no pesky environmental regulations. In fact, current policy moves--the right’s plans for Social Security, pension systems, and access to debt relief through bankruptcy--aim to turn the clock backward, not to the 19th century, but to the 13th. They’re going totally medieval on the social safety net.
http://www.newsreview.com/issues/sacto/2005-04-07/essay.asp