You generally put the remains in a bag, not strip the uni and burn it where the servicemember fell. If it isn't too badly damaged and the sight of it (battle damage) will not cause distress to the family, they will wash it sometimes and return it with the rest of the PEC (personal effects and clothing). I cannot see them using the 'covert ops' excuse, seeing as they were travelling in convoy formation, either.
The whole thing is very fishy, IMO. Early reports said he was yelling "I'm Pat Tillman, goddamn it" when he was being shot at, but the later reports would suggest that he didn't have time to say a goddamn thing. I also read here (
http://www.freezerbox.com/archive/blog.php?id=122 ) and elsewhere that he wanted to meet with Noam Chomsky.
Sad, how you cannot believe your own government anymore. They sold him as a package, and then when he no longer fit their mold, they first tried to cover it up, then trash the kid.
It has been bad before in this country, but this seems worse somehow to me than ever...
Other articles of interest:
FAMILY DEMANDS THE TRUTH:
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/09/25/MNGD7ETMNM1.DTL Were witnesses allowed to change their testimony on key details, as alleged by one investigator? Why did internal documents on the case, such as the initial casualty report, include false information? When did top Pentagon officials know that Tillman’s death was caused by friendly fire, and why did they delay for five weeks before informing his family?
“There have been so many discrepancies so far that it’s hard to know what to believe,” Mary Tillman said. “There are too many murky details.” The files the family received from the Army in March are heavily censored, with nearly every page containing blacked-out sections; most names have been deleted. (Names for this story were provided by sources close to the investigation.) At least one volume was withheld altogether from the family, and even an Army press release given to the media has deletions. On her copies, Mary Tillman has added competing marks and scrawls — countless color-coded tabs and angry notes such as “Contradiction!” “Wrong!” and “????”
A Chronicle review of more than 2,000 pages of testimony, as well as interviews with Pat Tillman’s family members and soldiers who served with him, found contradictions, inaccuracies and what appears to be the military’s attempt at self-protection.
For example, the documents contain testimony of the first investigating officer alleging that Army officials allowed witnesses to change key details in their sworn statements so his finding that certain soldiers committed “gross negligence” could be softened.
A COVER UP AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/max-blumenthal/a-coverup-at-the-highest_b_7878.htmlThe Chronicle's report not only strengthens the evidence that the Pentagon deliberately covered up Tillman's death from friendly-fire to better exploit him as a PR tool, it reveals that:
--Tillman joined the Army specifically to fight Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, but was sent to participate in the invasion of Iraq against his wishes. He called the invasion, "so fucking illegal."
--He was an avid reader and fan of Noam Chomsky. Tillman was scheduled to meet Chomsky upon his return from Afghanistan.
--Tillman was an independent-minded, outspoken Bush critic who planned to vote for John Kerry.
--On April 23, 2004, a day after he was killed, Tillman's bullet-riddled body armor was burned by a soldier. That same day, all Army Ranger top commanders were informed of the suspected fratricide.
--Two days later, Tillman's uniform was burned.
--On April 30, Tillman was awarded the Silver Star for bravery. "Through the firing Tillman’s voice was heard issuing fire commands to take the fight to the enemy on the dominating high ground,” the Army stated.
--Three days later, acting Army Secretary Lee Brownlee was told of Tillman's death by fratricide.
--On May 29, once Tillman's PR value had been exhausted, the Army admitted to his family that his death was a fratricide.
--ON November 14, an officer who interrogated Rangers involved in Tillman's killing stated he thought some could have been charged with "criminal intent" and other with "gross negligence."
--Portions of the Pentagon's report on Tillman's death were deleted.
The question now is, what did Donald Rumsfeld know about Tillman's death and when did he know it? If Army Ranger commanders and the Army Secretary knew Tillman was killed in a fratricide, Rumsfeld must have known too. The fact that when Tillman first joined the Army, Rumsfeld personally commended him with a signed letter seems especially relevant now. If Rumsfeld knew the nature of Tillman's killing in April, 2004, he undoubtedly directed the cover-up. And if Rumsfeld directed the cover-up, Karl Rove was aware of it, if not actively involved in exploiting it.
Supposedly John McCain has taken up the Tillman family's case in the Senate. If he's serious, he will convene hearings on the cover-up and compel Rumsfeld to testify. Until then, the Pentagon is conducting its own probe of Tillman's death, thus ensuring a newer, more sophisticated cover-up than ever before.