Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Salon - Keeping Dissent Invisible

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
StlMo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 05:24 AM
Original message
Salon - Keeping Dissent Invisible

Keeping Dissent Invisible


How the Secret Service and the White House keep protesters safely out of Bush's sight -- and off TV.

By Dave Lindorff


Oct. 16, 2003 | PHILADELPHIA -- When Bill Neel learned that President George W. Bush was making a Labor Day campaign visit to Pittsburgh last year to support local congressional candidates, the retired Pittsburgh steelworker decided that he would be on hand to protest the president's economic policies. Neel and his sister made a hand-lettered sign reading "The Bushes must love the poor -- they've made so many of us," and headed for a road where the motorcade would pass on the way from the airport to a Carpenters' Union training center.

He never got to display his sign for President Bush to see, though. As he stood among milling groups of Bush supporters, he was approached by a local police detective, who told him and his sister that because they were protesting, they had to move to a "free speech area," on orders of the U.S. Secret Service.

"He pointed out a relatively remote baseball diamond that was enclosed in a chain-link fence," Neel recalled in an interview with Salon. "I could see these people behind the fence, with their faces up against it, and their hands on the wire." (The ACLU posted photos of the demonstrators and supporters at that event on its Web site.) "It looked more like a concentration camp than a free speech area to me, so I said, 'I'm not going in there. I thought the whole country was a free speech area.'" The detective asked Neel, 66, to go to the area six or eight times, and when he politely refused, he handcuffed and arrested the retired steelworker on a charge of disorderly conduct. When Neel's sister argued against his arrest, she was cuffed and hauled off as well. The two spent the president's visit in a firehouse that was serving as Secret Service and police headquarters for the event.

...

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/10/16/secret_service/index.html

Free Salon Day Pass

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sieg Heil!
Der Fuerher only vants to see Supporters. He figures that the rest of the world believes what Faux News says. He is in for a rude awakening come 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. there's the good news in this tactic
Edited on Thu Oct-16-03 07:09 AM by ithacan
Of course it is VERY Orwellian:

In the ACLU's view, the strategy, besides violating a fundamental right of free speech and assembly, is damaging in two ways. "It insulates the government officials from seeing or hearing the protesters and vice-versa, and it gives to the media and the American public the appearance that there exists less dissent than there really is."

Certainly, as television cameras follow a presidential motorcade lined with cheering supporters, the image on the tube will be distorted if protesters have all been spirited away around a corner somewhere fenced in for the duration.


This is SO totalitarian yet the media are not seeing this as problematic.

Imagine if they tried to set up "2nd amendment zones"...

The good news: When authoritarian regimes have to resort to this kind of Orwellian tactic, it means they are in trouble. It means they are VERY insecure. It means they KNOW they are losers and the only way they can stay in power is to lie, distort and suppress.

There's hope!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Great News
I always wondered why ACLU had not sued over these infringement of free speech. Catch the paragraph about the judge who was assigned the case. :bounce: I hope he does issue a stay while the case is being decided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StlMo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. To be fair to the ACLU, the Bushies commit many, many crimes.

It is difficult to track and respond to every Bush attack on Liberty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StlMo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC