There is no good news coming out of the depressing and endless war in Afghanistan. There once was merit to our incursion there, but that was long ago. Now we’re just going through the tragic motions, flailing at this and that, with no real strategy or decent end in sight.
The U.S. doesn’t win wars anymore. We just funnel the stressed and underpaid troops in and out of the combat zones, while all the while showering taxpayer billions on the contractors and giant corporations that view the horrors of war as a heaven-sent bonanza. BP, as we’ve been told repeatedly recently, is one of the largest suppliers of fuel to the wartime U.S. military. ...
What’s happening in Afghanistan is not only tragic, it’s embarrassing. The American troops will fight, but the Afghan troops who are supposed to be their allies are a lost cause. The government of President Hamid Karzai is breathtakingly corrupt and incompetent — and widely unpopular to boot. And now, as The Times’s Dexter Filkins is reporting, the erratic Mr. Karzai seems to be giving up hope that the U.S. can prevail in the war and is making nice with the Taliban.
There is no overall game plan, no real strategy or coherent goals, to guide the fighting of U.S. forces. It’s just a mind-numbing, soul-chilling, body-destroying slog, month after month, year after pointless year. The 18-year-olds fighting (and, increasingly, dying) in Afghanistan now were just 9 or 10 when the World Trade Center and Pentagon were attacked in 2001...
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/12/opinion/12herbert.html?hp=&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1276351291-DsS05x1wLLYYqlMIXT5EWg
-----
OK, now comes a real interesting part. Look at the online comments and arrange them in the order of Readers' Recommendations:
http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2010/06/12/opinion/12herbert.html?sort=recommended
"Far left" positions have received overwhelmingly positive responses, with the first one, which basically outlines policies espoused by Dennis Kucinich and Alan Grayson, is 100 "yeses" ahead of the next one, which is also farther left than the conventional corporate Democrats' conventional "wisdom."
And before the DLCers start stammering about how the New York Times is a "left-wing" publication, well, actually no, it's mostly a rich yuppie publication that passes for "left" in this country, and you will see conservative positions, although in the minority, expressed, too, depending on the topic.
I guess my point is that the Tea Party and their corporate enablers get all the publicity in American media, while the contingent that is not even as far left as the Tea Partiers are far right, is ignored completely, except on the Internet and on the few cable access stations that run Democracy Now.