Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Evidence Arizona Immigration Law May Be Fatal Mistake for GOP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 11:20 AM
Original message
Evidence Arizona Immigration Law May Be Fatal Mistake for GOP
There is compelling new evidence that Republicans will rue the day that they allowed their virulent anti-immigrant wing to grab the controls of the Republican Party. In fact, contrary to much of the pundit chatter, a drama is playing out this fall that may doom Republicans to permanent minority status in America.

The passage of the Arizona "papers, please" anti-immigration law has forced Republican politicians around the country into a political box canyon that does not offer an easy escape. For fear of offending the emergent Tea Party - and other anti-immigrant zealots in their own base -- they are precipitating a massive realignment of Latino voters nationwide.

According to data released by Public Policy Polling (PPP), Texas Governor Rick Perry has lost his early lead over Democratic challenger Bill White and the race is now tied. The movement from a previous PPP poll in February comes entirely from Hispanic voters. PPP reports that:

"With white voters Perry led 54-36 then and leads 55-35 now. With black voters White led 81-12 then and 70 -7 now. But with Hispanics Perry has gone from leading 53-41 to trailing 55-21....there is no doubt the (Arizona) immigration bill is popular nationally. But if it causes Hispanics to change their voting behavior without a parallel shift among whites then it's going to end up playing to Democratic advantage this fall."

The punditry sometimes forgets that in politics intensity is often just as important as poll percentages. For many Hispanic voters, the Arizona immigration law is an insult. It is an attack on their very identity. And it is certainly a litmus test that tells a Hispanic voter whether or not a political candidate is on their side - the critical threshold test of voter decision making.

The same is simply not true for non-Hispanic voters. As a result, by allowing the Party to be defined by the anti-immigrant zealots - and refusing to lift a finger to pass comprehensive immigration reform in Congress - the Republicans are playing with political fire.

In fact, given the fact that Hispanics are the fastest-growing segment of the American electorate, the Republicans are playing with permanent marginality. As if to sharpen their anti-immigrant brand, last week the Texas Republican State Convention voted for a platform that included a plank calling on the state government to adopt a state law like the one in Arizona.

But Texas is far from the only place where the emerging Latino backlash is in evidence. PPP reports that its latest polls in Colorado show that incumbent Democratic Senator Michael Bennett has gone from tying his opponent Republican Jane Norton to a three-point lead largely because his lead among Hispanic voters has soared from 12 to 21 points.

California Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman felt compelled to back tough anti-immigrant measures to get the Republican nomination. Now her support among Latinos is hemorrhaging, dropping from 35 to 26 points from March to May. Since the primary, Whitman has begun to waffle on her tough anti-immigrant stand but the damage has been done - what's more, it's memorialized in videos that Democrat Jerry Brown is sure to loop over and over on Spanish language TV.

Even in districts where the Hispanic vote is not large, big declines in Republican support could prove decisive in otherwise close races. After all the difference between getting 49.9% and 51.1% means everything in an election. The bottom line is that by passing the Arizona "papers, please" law, Republicans - especially in the West - have awakened a sleeping and growing giant.

More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-creamer/evidence-arizona-immigrat_b_623790.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Threatening the fastest growing voting demographic in America is not a sound electoral strategy.
Edited on Thu Jun-24-10 11:36 AM by MidwestTransplant
They just can't help themselves though. They are teabaggers at heart and just don't like people who aren't like them or are too impotent to stand up against their fellow teabagger racists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vampire Knight Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Just wondering:
Doesn't the use of that term seem offensive toward homosexuals? I don't see how very many of them would want to be associated with that particular movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disillusioned73 Donating Member (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I am unsure if your being serious or disingenuous..
but when was "teabagging" deemed a homosexual sex act??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. I vote "disingenuous", but don't take my word for it. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. The Teabaggers picked their name and they can now live
with it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. I don't think only guys can "teabag"
Edited on Fri Jun-25-10 08:26 PM by MidwestTransplant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. People have been over this about 9000 times.
*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. And since half those teabaggers seem to be senior citizens...
I can't see that group out-pacing Latinos when it comes to population growth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. "permanent minority status in America"
has been predicted for both the Dems and the GOP in just this past decade.

I'll believe it when I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vampire Knight Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Agreed.
People just love to jump the gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh joy. I needed some good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vampire Knight Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. In Texas? *shrugs*
I don't think the writer should use Texas as his example. The way things work in Texas, it's almost possible that passing an Arizona-like law might get Perry re-elected in a landslide. As it is, Texas is not currently fomenting such legislation, so I don't think that the mere rumor could cause a significant change in the polls.

This legislation is proving surprisingly popular, not just in Arizona, but across the country. I haven't read it yet, but I probably will soon because the right's pundits are saying that it is actually in harmony with existing federal laws. I'd be interested to know if this is true.

I can somewhat see why Arizona might have taken this extreme stand: the state is a war zone, and they feel like no one's doing anything about it. This, along with the 10th amendment resolutions that were being considered by many states seem to indicate to me that the state governments see Obama as unsure and indecisive. Add to those the efforts of Louisiana to protect their shorelines from the oil spill. Whenever Obama seems weak, the state governments are going to try and "pick up the slack" in ways similar to those employed by Arizona.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Good. You can start here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. The state is a warzone?
What, pray tell, is Ciudad Juarez/El Paso, then? Candyland?
The OP is about the association between virulent anti-immigration ideology and the GOP. It doesn't matter whether the legislation is actually going to be passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disillusioned73 Donating Member (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. "have awakened a sleeping and growing giant."
oh, yes they have :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. It's both hilariously funny and worryingly dangerous. The Rs have crafted
a coalition increasingly dependent on extremism: the extremism of religious wackos like the Dispensationalists, the extremism of the political nutters who inhabit the bizarro-world of CPAC, the extremism of anti-government ideologues like Grover Norquist, the extremism of the talk radio clowns who gave us the Oklahoma City bombing, the extremism of the nativist xenophobes ...

The Rs have painted themselves into a corner and don't have a clear escape from this confederacy of lunatics. So for the near term, the Rs will be forced to move further into the Twilight Zone

The coalition is held together by hatred and conspiracy theories, and it's funded by certain business interests. Nobody in their right mind would support that crowd, if well-informed, but of course the corporate media really won't educate folk about about this stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daveparts still Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. The Republicans
are going to lose the Latino vote? Where did they ever have the Latino vote besides South Florida and Miami. Next you'll be telling me they're going to lose the African American vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vampire Knight Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Lol. Good point.
The gay vote may be in peril as well. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hassin Bin Sober Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Yeah, it's not like Florida ever swayed an election or anything.
Or Texas, or Nevada.

I, for one, am happy the thugs show their true colors to a demographic that will be a majority in a few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. Do the math
Edited on Mon Jun-28-10 12:24 PM by grantcart

if a party gives up 80% of the AA and Hispanic (and LGBT) vote that means that of the 25% of the total population that they immediately lose 20% of the total.

Of the 80% left of the general population about 15% are diehard Democratic white voters.

Of the 65% left they would have to get over 80% of non diehard Democratic white voters to win.

The numbers aren't there, and even George Bush was smart enough to add that up.

For the short term benefit of surviving far right primary opponents Republican politicians are throwing their long term future under the bus.


edited to add

The article is right on about intensity of support.

All the people who like this law was going to vote Republican any way.

All it did is give an incentive for Hispanic voters to run away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC