Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Post here what you think the 9/11 final report will reveal.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 04:39 AM
Original message
Post here what you think the 9/11 final report will reveal.
I believe one of the most obvious conclusions in the report will be that we have a security weakness in the transition between presidential administrations. Look at the evidence:

Within a month of Clinton's first term, we had the bombing of the WTC; and after nine months of the Bush Administration's term, we witnessed a total destruction of the buildings. It's obvious that our enemies have spotted a weakness.

I think the report will conclude that we need someone like Sandy Berger at the helm in the executive branch, holding daily briefings with the intelligence agencies; and that this person needs to stay on for a period of time during the next president's term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
imax2268 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. well...
we still might not know after the White House get's through "blacking out" page after page of information...

seeing how this administration handles things...it probably won't reveal that much...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booksenkatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. It'll be short and sweet
They'll conclude that both the Clinton and Bush administrations are equally culpable; that hindsight is 20/20; and that nothing, really, could have been done to stop 9/11. Nothing to see here, let's move on. Time to put all that nastiness behind us. We've got a war on terra to fight!
THE END
:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Lee Harvet Oswald
acted alone. There was no conspiracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. They'll seal it up until 2079.
Give some crazy, implausible excuse for what happened which will be trumpeted over and over in the media and the full report will be sealed for 75 years. That's what they normally do in situations where the security was purposefully lax just on that particular day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. In a nutshell...
whilst Clinton was president, it could easily have been prevented. After January 2001, however, there was nothing anybody could do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I agree that the 9/11 commission has to recognize that Clinton's system
worked and I do forsee that they will endorse it in the report. They may try to disguise it, but it will be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. Aren't there several thousand pages of Clinton papers that the WH won't...
release. I guess they must show Clinton did good and Bush did bad.
We'll never know, will we? Just like JFK and Oswald!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. The 9/11 Commission will give Smirk a gentleman's 'C'.
Since Lee (the fixer) Hamilton is involved, the report will do nothing more than point fingers at fingers. The GOP always relies upon Hamilton to cover over their dung trails.

So I expect the commission's conclusion to be that "mistakes were made" by both the Clinton and Bush administrations, but nobody was really at fault and it's time to move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guava Jelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. that ink is cheap
we will get a few hundred pages blacked out partially with soviet style ink outs.
its a a sham
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoedogg Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. It just so happens,
I have an advance copy.
(I'm an important man!)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. lol!
good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imax2268 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. that's funny...!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. It's entirely Clinton's fault...
Because he couldn't keep his Big Mac in his pants and that gave the terrorists time to sneak onto our soil and fly into the twin towers even if that hasn't happened yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Mandate Here. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. The cynic in me agrees with these assessments, but
I was surprised to see this ...

<http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/05/politics/05PANE.html>

-snip- (describing the interview with Kean and Hamilton)

They also suggested that Ms. Rice, Mr. Bush's national security adviser, would be questioned aggressively on Thursday about why the administration had not taken more action against Al Qaeda before Sept. 11, and about discrepancies between her public statements and those of Richard A. Clarke, the president's former counterterrorism chief, who has accused the administration of largely ignoring terrorist threats in 2001.

"The whole story might have been different," Mr. Kean said on the NBC News program "Meet the Press," outlining a series of intelligence and law enforcement blunders in the months and years before the attacks.

"There are so many threads and so many things, individual things, that happened," he said. "If we had been able to put those people on the watch list of the airlines, the two who were in the country; again, if we'd stopped some of these people at the borders; if we had acted earlier on Al Qaeda when Al Qaeda was smaller and just getting started."

This, from AP, was even in my local paper

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. I think the point is, that we could have put it all together if Sandy
Berger had been at the helm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Lone Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
14. The commission was rigged from the start.
Bush and Cheney have rigged the game. The commission will rewrite history and the truth is dead stinking carp upon the beach in the moonlight it shines silver, but it smells like hell.

Remember Bush and Cheney's policy is lying and deception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
16. We need Patriot Act III...
That's been the result of every committee so far: faced with the contradiction that the FBI knew at the top and bottom, but obstructed at the level of middle management, legislators cut back on our civil rights rather that entertain any Bush Knew ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
17. It was Barney the dog's fault
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC