yellowcanine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 07:20 PM
Original message |
Washington Post hasn't written an editorial about the latest Iraq events. |
|
Has anyone else noticed that? I wonder why that is? Could it be because they have been shilling the pro war position and need time to adjust to the turn of events?
|
Aidoneus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 07:26 PM
Response to Original message |
1. They're waiting to get their orders |
|
The bosses aren't quite sure how to react to watching their little fiefdom slip away.
|
huckleberry
(729 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 07:27 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Yes! I noticed that too. |
|
They're probably embarrassed because they were so gung-ho on the war.
|
meow mix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 07:37 PM
Response to Original message |
3. WP your war has started - how do you like it? makes u happy? |
|
i wonder if they will suddenly just stop everything.. and realize how stupid and insane they are.
one can hope!
|
jackstraw45
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 07:39 PM
Response to Original message |
4. They were tripping over themselves |
|
in support of war.
An apology to their readers would be appropriate.
|
PROGRESSIVE1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 07:39 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Read the New York Times. At least they have Krugman and opposed... |
revcarol
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 07:49 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Rove is too busy taking care of the mess in his pants |
|
to get to them. Give him time. The spin of how good that all these "terrorists" were drawn out so that we could fight them will hit the paper soon.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 04:16 PM
Response to Original message |