kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-09-04 06:02 AM
Original message |
|
In response to a question about Iraq at yesterday's hearing, Condi Rice said, "There was a discussion of Iraq. I think it was raised by Don Rumsfeld. It was pressed a bit by Paul Wolfowitz."
It was "pressed a bit by Paul Wolfowitz"? Just how much is a "bit"?
Her comments prove that the Administration was focusing on Iraq, but it doesn't tell us how much. She had earlier said that "Iraq was to the side" immediately after 9/11. However, according to the Washington Post, Bush had signed "a 2-and-a-half-page document marked 'TOP SECRET'" six days after 9/11 that "directed the Pentagon to begin planning military options for an invasion of Iraq."
Shouldn't the Commission pursue the PNAC involvement just a little deeper? And Bush and Cheney's commitment to the PNAC "theory"...
|
murielm99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-09-04 06:08 AM
Response to Original message |
|
throw Condi's lying ass in jail for perjury.
And make sure she is just the first to go!
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-09-04 06:53 AM
Response to Original message |
2. the PNAC is what they all know about |
|
but don't want to ever discuss it in a public forum such as an investigation hearing. The masses will start figuring things out.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 02:54 PM
Response to Original message |