Money theory

[peacetalksforall]

this morning on Washington Journal...callers kept saying that Bush and his backers were in Iraq for the oil. When questioned by Brian Lamb as to motive, he kept challenging these people by asking why they (implying Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc.) would want more money from oil when each of them already had plenty of money (paraphrased).

An alternate money theory:

The people who are running the show (within our country and with partners in other countries) need to fund their secret government takeover. Goals for their version of governing include control of earth resources with no dissent supported by their legislation and executive orders that provide their version of legality which they will reinforce through warring on single people, mass gatherings, and entire countries and cultures or races or religions, as required. They cannot divert their money to fight dissenters or provide charity of any kind. Propaganda is essential for winning with the least amount of money spent.

They require tons of money for their agenda. There is a ton of money already missing from various governmental departments, we don't know where all the money taken from the phoney corporations (right out of pensions) has gone to, the social security of the citizenry has been robbed, the corporations are robbing the country of taxes, and corporations steal direct from the pockets of other businesses and private citizens as in the case of the California energy crises. Here and abroad, the government partners with corporations and the intelligene agencies and military are used to smooth the way.

A grand portion of the money is needed to buy participation. Example, it appears Poland is being funded/reimbursed for their participation in Iraq by your tax dollars in all aspects of their participation, except the the humans may only be getting common human pay.

The takeover is in progress and a lot of money has already been spent - the takeover of major media in this country, buying of countries, investment in people control from research in mind control to lethal steel and to the IT world. A government leader in this administration means an opportunity for a corporate head to make faster progress in a Washington job on behalf of the cabal.

It takes a ton of money to spy on you and me from the satellites or through the airwaves and cables. It takes money for the teams of data processors. It takes money to dictate intrusion of privacy, then try to defend it in courts if the concept isn't swallowed.

The cold war supported the takeover for decades. We are in a confusing stage, but one that is allowing us to see what is going on because it is an immense undertaking and cannot be perfectly controlled and progressed at every moment.

We are fortunate to be able to know more than we could have in previous decades. It is everyone's duty to explore the real world of world leaders and start opening our eyes unless you believe that it is their world, not ours or their country, not ours.

We have to know if it's true that this is a country of the people, for the people, by the people...or for a few. We have to know if it's true that other countries of the world can retain sovereign rights and their culture and religion without dictation... or not.

[yella_dawg]

1. Awesome post.

Thank you.

[K-W]

2. You cant take over something you already control.

It isnt about money, its about global economic leverage.

[camero]

4. It's not even about that

It's about keeping the masses under their thumb. Which does take an awful lot of money to control 6 billion people.

[rock]

3. The rich don't want more money

Pretty stupid isn't it?