Faux Greta Poll re: Bush/Cheney 911 Cmsn Testimony

[swag]

www.foxnews.com

"President Bush and Vice President Cheney are going to talk privately, together and not under oath to the 9/11 Commission. Which best describes your opinion?"

[boobooday]

1. This one needs help!

The results so far are FAUX!

http://www.wgoeshome.com

[Racenut20]

2. I am part of the 15%

That voted for separate under oath.

[swag]

3. Me too

Because it's time.

[dand]

15. Me too, then I had to take a shower, fox news makes me feel dirty.

[LittleApple81]

4. All this proves is that the Amorons watch fox. Voted, but it is

a waste of time if 34% say they should not even testify.

[FreakinDJ]

5. Well that thing has been Freeped to death

[Vickers]

9. Then even the FREEPS want them to testify

If you add up the different options FOR testifying, in whatever iteration, it is:

61% want them to testify
34% don't want that

Now, I'm sure Faux worded it this way so they can dilute the "testify" folks, and they can honestly (sic) say, "More folks want them to stay out of it than any other group!!!"

[Narraback]

6. Done

President Bush and Vice President Cheney are going to talk privately, together and not under oath to the 9/11 Commission. Which best describes your opinion?

a. They should not talk to the 9/11 commission at all (34%)
26,760

b. They should each testify publicly and under oath (15%)
11,993

c. They should each talk privately to the 9/11 commission -- but not together (16%)
12,529

d. They should talk privately to the 9/11 commission -- together and not under oath (30%)
23,826

e. None of the above (5%)
3,623


78,731 total votes

[skooooo]

7. Would help if your subject line was better...

..so that people know to go and vote.

[baronessniki]

8. The spin to protect Bush's hide is driving me nuts!

The PDB is not 'remarkable.' Just suppose this same PDB had been given to Clinton and we were talking about 9/11 under a Clinton administration.

[Skittles]

11. Clinton's head would have been on a stick by now

period

[EdGy]

10. what are they trying to hide? why are they afraid of the truth?

How can anyone be against them testifying under oath, UNLESS they KNOW that the truth that would come out would destroy this regime?

This is SO telling, isn't it the Republicans who, on the subject of civil liberties, spout the line: If you're innocent you have nothing to be afraid of.

This is the line the Democrats should be pushing: Why won't they swear to tell the truth? What are they afraid of? What are they ashamed of?

[cosmicdot]

12. what kind of patriot would say not at all - don't they love America?

a. They should not talk to the 9/11 commission at all (34%)
27,099

b. They should each testify publicly and under oath (15%)
12,236

c. They should each talk privately to the 9/11 commission -- but not together (16%)
12,686

d. They should talk privately to the 9/11 commission -- together and not under oath (30%)
24,116

e. None of the above (5%)
3,661


79,798 total votes

[Old and In the Way]

13. Apparently, supporting a liar and incompetant, lazy unelected fraud

is more important than the truth and justice for the 3,000 American lives lost on 9/11. Since no one is held accountable, why are we more secure today? Why do these people hate America so much?

[K8-EEE]

14. They Should Be Ashamed That Bush Needs Babysitter Uncle Dick!!

GOD!!! THAT SPEAKS VOLUMES..