Is Wolf Blitzer a credible journalist?

[The Zanti Regent]

Wolfie ignores his instant polls, so let's torture his ass!

On edit--let's keep it kicked so everyone can have some well deserved fun!

[trumad]

1. As about as credible as Ann Landers....

:eyes:

[freetobegay]

2. No, no and no!

eom

[xray s]

3. in the tradition of Pravda-YES!

[Webster Green]

4. Not credible.....

and not a journalist.

[evil_orange_cat]

5. ROFL 96% no

[rocktivity]

6. The mainstream media is Bush's biggest ally

And we've got to undremine it somehow. Maybe this is a way--a organized survey or poll evaluating the talking heads and their coverage!

:headbang:
rocknation

[WannaJumpMyScooter]

7. Well, he is a journalist, and he can write, but he is a one issue

guy.... Israel.

He covered Jerusalem for Reuters and then came to DC to cover Washington for the Jerusalem Post, very possibly a Mossad plant there.

He has an authorities look, and that is all CNN cared about. He is way over his head in most everything now, since he has no frame of reference more current than the mid-80's.

In my book, scum of the worst kind.

[The Zanti Regent]

8. I have to kick it

Got to have more folks see it!

[Blue-Jay]

9. No, but he has the coolest name EVER!

What could be a better name?

Rock Womantaker?
Fist Commiekiller?
Johnny Bicep?
Stoney Curtis? (for Flintstones fans)
Sid Vicious? (OK, that one is taken)
Rod Turgid?
Felix Menderchuck?

[The Zanti Regent]

10. Kick again

so more people can have fun torturing Wolfy Boy!

[Kadie]

11. Only when he says something I agree with.

:7

[SoCalDem]

12. I report......YOU decide

[Zinfandel]

13. A poll Wolfie should analyze.

[guitar man]

14. Fuck no

Wolfowitz Blitzer is a complete asshat.:thumbsdown:

[frank frankly]

15. no and neither is his beard

wolfie is TERRIBLE

:puke:

[frank frankly]

16. no and neither is his beard

wolfie is TERRIBLE

:puke: