Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Al-Sadr Threatens Homicide Attacks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
VTMechEngr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 11:39 PM
Original message
Al-Sadr Threatens Homicide Attacks
Really? Sounds like A No shit Sherlock kind of statement. I mean, isn't the purpose of a suicide attack to kill. What do you guys think about this moronic wording?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,117957,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. He probably said suicide attack..

"Homicide bomber" is just a term used by Fox to show allegiance to the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. notice Sadr is not threatening his own suicide, but other people's/
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. and you don't see shrub with an m16 either..
what's your point? Ever seen Sharon in battle gear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Chill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Are you defending Sadr?
You can't be serious, no liberal can honestly defend Sadr. He stands for Islamic fundamentalism, which in case your new to the plant goes against everything liberals support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. i'm not necessarily defending sadr..
I just can't believe that some people on this board expect these people are going to sit on their nuts and do nothing. Since they don't have gunships, or F18s, they resort to whatever methods are available.

I would be interested to know how you would react to an occupying force in your neighborhood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. So what, so he becomes a liberal or dies?
Is that your liberal stance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. I knew it had to be Faux
When I saw "homicide attacks." That's so idiotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VTMechEngr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It just drive me Nuts. The point of bombing is to kill
But a suicide bombing is a specific kind that ends with the bombers suicide. I mean, a homocide bombing can be by a plane, by tank, by pipe bomb on porch. Only on the republican news channel I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. exactly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbillhaywood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Read George Orwell's "Politics in the English Language"
Same with targeted killing instead of "assasination", modifying words to make description more politically expedient. Both these terms came from Israeli lobby media think-tanks. It's just bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. how about " pacifying" Fallujah? what the hell does that mean, when
what they intend to do is bomb the hell out of it unless the terrorists get out of town
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No2W2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Fux news changes another AP story
Edited on Mon Apr-26-04 12:03 AM by No2W2004
Fux Version
Al-Sadr Threatens Homicide Attacks
Friday, April 23, 2004
Associate Press
KUFA, Iraq — A Shiite Muslim cleric threatened on Friday to launch homicide attacks if U.S. troops attack him and his forces in the holy city of Najaf. Muqtada al-Sadr was speaking during the Friday prayers sermon in Kufa, another Shiite Muslim holy city few miles from Najaf. The area is mostly controlled by his Al-Mahdi Army militia, whose members have clashed with U.S. troops several times since their uprising began on April 4.

AP Version
Iraqi Cleric Al Sadr Threatens Attacks

Fri Apr 23,11:07 PM ET
By QASSID JABBAR, Associated Press Writer

Radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr threatened Friday to unleash suicide bombers if U.S. troops move against him in Iraq's holiest Shiite city, and his militiamen attacked a Bulgarian convoy, killing a soldier. Meanwhile, police in Basra arrested five Iraqis believed linked to al-Qaida and suspected in brutal suicide bombings Wednesday that killed 74 people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. Faux Speak!
The idea that we should call them "homicide" bombers is laughably redundant.

Every bomber is trying to kill people. That's the whole purpose. The difference between a pilot dropping a bomb, or a nutjob like Tim McVeigh, is that they don't go up with the device.

Soldiers are acting in war, so it's not legal homicide. But, McVeigh certainly was guilty of it. So, he was a HOMICIDE bomber. A guy who straps one to his own body, and then sets it off in a crowd is a suicide bomber. The only distinction between the two is the location of the bomber when the device goes off.

Somehow or other, the propagandists thought that the term "suicide bomber" implied sympathy to the attacker. I don't know who would think such a thing, but that appears to be the reasoning.

Since it came from the neocons, it must be stupid.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RafterMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Not just Fox
The jihadis get pissy about the term, too, since suicide is forbidden.

Maybe we can all settle on "collateral damage bombs".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. How About, "Killers"?
That's simple enough, huh?
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC